Advanced Search Results

Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karedla Suryanarayana and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 10F, 43A(1A), 163, 209, 219, 284, 397, 398 and 402; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 19; Company Law Board Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 44; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 59, 102 and 114; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2002]110CompCas193(AP)

Committee of Chartered Accountants appointed by High Court to determine valuation of shares held by minority shareholders. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in the said meeting and he was not accorded any opportunity to explain his position as envisaged under Section 284 of the Act. His further case is that once the board decided to convene the meeting as per

Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Section 57; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

order dated 20th February 2009 whereby in exercise of its power to review under Section 57 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 („CA 2006) the Government of India („GOI) in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) (Respondent No.1) set aside a … in any of the previous sanctions quoted above, and moreover, since the building plan in r/o Bo. No. 284, having much larger area than the old sanctioned one, had already been sanctioned by the GOC-in-C, and as

Executive Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board Vs. Auro Swamy and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 179 and 181; Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976; Public Premises (Eviction or Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 151 - Order 41

Reported in : 2007(4)ALD796; 2007(5)ALT786

action according to the plaintiffs is contrary to the provisions of the law and especially that of the Cantonments Act, as no notice of show-cause has been issued, therefore, entire such action on their part is totally illegal. … been granted after expiry of the statutory period, therefore, they had commenced erection of the sheds in September, 2006. While the work was in progress the officials of defendants 1 and 2 without any prior notice or … without making a formal application and obtaining a permission as required under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act no person can raise any structure. Further, … a compound wall of 400 feet length from north to south and 284 feet from east to west with a dimension of 1 1/2 to

Power Grid Corporation of India Vs. Rajasthan Power Procurement

Court : Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Military area crossing: There was delay in getting permission from Military authorities, effecting 3 tower locations near Banbasa Cantonment area near Tanakpur.; and (d) Delay in getting shutdown for crossing UPCL feeders: Many times shutdowns on various … the general public in response to the notices published by the petitioner under Section 54 of the Electricity Act, 2003.7. As per Clause (1) of Regulation 52 of the 2004 regulations, subject to prudence check, the actual … for interest on working capital are given hereunder: (Rs. in lakh) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 (Pro rata)Maintenance Spares 157.61 163.92 173.75 184.18O & M expenses … The petitioner has claimed the transmission charges as under: (Rs. in lakh)Depreciation 284.88 440.71 440.71 440.71Interest on Loan 311.94 460.11 437.64 412.08Return on Equity 378.50

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … state sovereignty.” Lopez v. Monterey County , 525 U. S. 266 , 284 (1999). The majority attempts to portray the circuit court judge’s decision as … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

Harish Chander Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1943All277

J.8. I agree and have nothing to add.Yorke, J. 9. I also agree.10. This application is dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Anderson (1942) 1942 A. C. 206 and Greene v. Secretary of State for Home Affairs (1942) 1942 A.C. 284. It is well to remember in this connexion that the Defence of India Act is an emergency measure

Govind Nagar Sugar Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 15(1), 16 - Rules 21, 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 125B; Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 1 and 13; Kerala Forest Act, 1961 - Sections 2; U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rule 23A; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 13; Income-tax Act, 1992 - Sections 15C; Sugar Undertaking (Taking over of Management) Act, 1977

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC65

Section 12 (C) - estimation must be considered by Cane Commissioner while allotting land for cane cultivation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … this argument, he relied upon the case of Alma Ram Mittal v. Ishwar Singh Puma, (1988) 4 SCC 284. In this case the Apex Court was dealing with the provisions of Sections 1 (3) and 13 (1)

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4, Chennai Vs. M/s. Mansi Fin ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

refer to a judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of CIT v. E. Udayakumar [2006] 284 ITR 511 where the Madras High Court has referred to the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High … (a) and (b) of Section 2(14)(iii) of the Act. i.e. within the jurisdiction of a municipality or a cantonment board having population of not less than ten thousand or in an area not being more than eight

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Shree Ambika Sugars Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI C.M.A.No.651 of 2006 --- Commissioner of Central Excise Central Excise Commissionerate No.1, Williams Road Tiruchirapalli-620 … Shastri Bhawan Annexe, No.26, Haddows Road Chennai-600 006 3.The Commissioner of Customs &Central Excise Appeals-II, No.1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy … Shastri Bhawan Annexe, No.26, Haddows Road Chennai-600 006 .. Respondents CMA filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 against the Final order passed in 1029 of 2005 dated 19.07.2005 by the Customs Excise and Service