Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 282 · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 31 2014

New JaIn Godowns, Budaun and Another Vs. Ito, Budaun and Another

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2014

Subject : Direct Taxation

ii) 'CIT vs. Max India Ltd.', 295 ITR 282 (SC); iii) 'CIT vs. Honda Siel Power Products … in an urban area, i.e., (i) In any area comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality, or a cantonment board having a population of not less than 10,000 as per the last preceding census published before the … a loss of ` 3,804/- was declared. Vide Order dated 08.05.2007, passed u/s 143 (3) of the IT Act, the assessment of the assessee was completed at an income of ` 86,460/- by the Assessing Officer, on … A.D. Jain, Judicial Member: 1. This is Assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 against the order dated 24.03.2009, passed by the Ld. CIT, Moradabad, enhancing … Act, failing to appreciate that the twin conditions envisaged in the said Section, i.e., the assessment order being erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2008

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-27-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia … that date. See Young v. Fordice , 520 U. S. 273 , 282-283. Pp. 10-12. (b) While not controlling here, three precedents addressing §5’s term

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Godha and anr. Vs. Naik Ram and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All152

- Suit to establish right--Small Cause Court suit--Civil Procedure Cede, Section 283--Act XI of 1865, Section 6. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the question referred to us is to understand how, having regard to the language of Sections 280, 281, 282 and 283 of the Procedure Code, and Article 11 of the Limitation Law, a suit against a decree-holder,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 31 1969

Balbhadar Prasad Vs. the Maharajah of Betia

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All351

security--Unstamped document--Admissibility of evidence of consideration aliunde--Suit for money lent--Act I of 1872 (Evidence Act), Section 91. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the parties been reduced to writing. The following extract from Best's Principles of Evidence, second edition, p. 282, puts very well what is meant: 'Where the contents of any document are in question, either as a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1954

Mohammad Sabir Ali Vs. Tahir Ali and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-22-1954

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103; Muhammedan Law; Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 60; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 6; Oudh Estates Act, 1869 - Sections 2, 11, 12 and 18

Reported in : AIR1957All94

in making waqf invalid - Cypres doctrine to be applied - intention of testator to be seen. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … man to make a beginning with himself and give the remainder to his family. (Ameer Ali's Mahommedan Law, 282). 'In Fatawai Kazi Khan it is stated 'A person makes a waqf for the poor and conditions that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2008

J. Parthiban and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary to ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-27-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999) - Sections 2, 3 and 3(2); Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 6, 7, 12, 12(3), 19, 21 and 22; Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act 1956 - Sections 26; Delhi Municipal Corporation Service Regulations of 1959 - Regulation 4 (1)

Reported in : AIR2008Mad203; (2008)3MLJ657

for acquiring the required land of 583 Hectares in Anakaputhur, Pammal, Pozhichalur, Manapakkam, Kolappakkam, Tarapakkam, Cowl Bazaar, Pallavaram Cantonment and Gerugambakkam Villages in Kancheepuram District, on the northern side of Chennai Airport as per the Land Plan … the acquisition proceedings initiated by the State Government under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999) (hereinafter referred to as 'the T.N.Acquisition Act') for the expansion of … of the administrative sanction, the District Collector, Kancheepuram has issued notices under Section 3(2) of the Industrial Purposes Act to the landholders in respect of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2013

Smt. Nanda Josh Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-09-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

BY THE MILITARY HOSPITAL, ROORKEE. P6- COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATED 09 03/2011, ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR CANTONMENT BOARD, ROORKEE CANTT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.R1A COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD … will not come within the scope of Section 7 and Explanation (b) O.P.(AFT)No.2003/2012 -5- of the Family Courts Act. It is further submitted that one of the main reasons for the Armed Forces Tribunal for accepting the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial