Advanced Search Results

indra Mani Shukla Vs. Collector, Allahabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : BankingConsumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Credit Act, 1973 - Sections 11A, 12B, 12C and 126; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms, Act, 1950 - Sections 279, 280 and 281; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC69

to make statement of account based on simple interest and recovery proceeding at Forum to be stayed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 1986 and Sections 11A, 12B and 126 of U.P. Agricultural Credit Act, 1973 and Sections 279, 280 and 281 of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - agricultural loan from Bank - bank charging

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Control of Organized Crime Act, 2001 (renamed from Andhra Pradesh COCA, 2001); Section 18 of the Sikkim Anti-Drugs Act, 2006; Section 20 of the Gujrat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015; Section 19 of the Mizoram Drug

Sanatan Dharam Mandir Society Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

same demonstrated the land to be in a Cantonment Area. However the counsel could not show from the Cantonments Act, 2006 as to who is to maintain the General Land Register or constitution of any Authority as the Cantonment … the learned Additional District Judge has presumed acquisition of land from the proof only of the Notification under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and without any award pursuant to land acquisition having been proved.

People's Movement for Civic Action through Its General Secretary, Patr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

the VP that the construction was not made by respondent No.6 until 2006 or even later. Hence the initial sanction/approval/permission/licence of 31st May, 1995 has … Council for Enviro Legal Action Vs. Union of India 1996 (5) SCC 281; Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India 2000(10) SCC 664; Delhi Development … upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay Vs. Cantonment Board and Ors., Pune being SLP No. 647 of 1992 Jt 1992(4) SC 538 with other matters in … the Town and Country Planning Department, respondent No.4, (TP) under Section 44 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (TP Act) and the Village Panchayat Curea, Bambolim and Talaolim, Tiswadi, Goa, respondent No.2, (VP) under Regulation

Shri N Madhubabu Vs. Bharat Electronics Limited

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

“13. Our attention has been drawn to the provision of sub- section (2) of section 281 of the Cantonment Act, which provides that all rules made under the Act shall be published in the official Gazette and … recognized Union for collective bargaining from 1994 to 2003 and again, from 2006 to May, 2022.4. The first petitioner is a workman and an office … hereunder for easy reference: “13. Our attention has been drawn to the provision of sub- section (2) of section 281 of the Cantonment Act, which provides that all rules made under the Act shall be published in the

Posani Subbaiah Vs. Doppalalpudi Chilakamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hindu Succession Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 7; Evidence Act - Sections 13 and 32(5); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD370; 2004(2)ALT475

factual foundation - under circumstances negligence cannot be established - held, decree passed in earlier suit justified. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … on the file of Subordinate Judge, Guntur, which was confirmed by the Judgment and decree in A.S. No. 281/69, dated 25-6-1973 by the High Court, as not binding on the plaintiff and the 8th defendant in the

Godha and anr. Vs. Naik Ram and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All152

- Suit to establish right--Small Cause Court suit--Civil Procedure Cede, Section 283--Act XI of 1865, Section 6. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … for the recovery of those goods against any one into whose hands they have come.... Sections 280 and 281 of the Civil Procedure Code relate only to execution-proceedings, and have no application to a substantive suit, which

Basanthilal Aggarwal and anr. Vs. P.S. Bhamdari and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 4 and 8; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 82 and 92; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 34

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD805; 2007(2)ALT566

prayed for in L.G.C.No. 258 of 1995. However, there shall be no separate order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Lakshmana Bapuji (2002) 3 SCC 258 this Court, after examining the scheme of the Act, held: (SCC p. 281, paras 40-41)40. To make out a case in a civil case that the appellant is a land-grabber the

Farhatullah Vs. Mohammad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1930All89

result is that in my opinion both appeals must fail and they are dismissed accordingly with costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … AIR1925All341 ; Mahabal liurmi v. Sarju [1917] 4 O.L.J. 454 and Sheo Sahai v. Rajeshwari [1919] 6 O.L.J. 281. The result is that in my opinion both appeals must fail and they are dismissed accordingly with costs.

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … baseline to qualify as a change. Young , 520 U. S., at 281 (quoting 42 U. S. C. §1973c).[ Footnote 7 ] For the reasons … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia