Advanced Search Results

Shri Vinod Kumar Bakshi and ors. Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 17, 28, 28(2), 29, 30 and 31; Cantonment Act, 1924; Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rules 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(3), 13(7), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1) and 19; Cantonment Board Rules - Rule 13(3)

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi131; 149(2008)DLT643

as member of the Board are concerned, the same are contained in Sections 28 & 29 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 which deserves to be … 50,000 persons and consequently it is a category 1 cantonment.10. Prior to coming into force of the Cantonment Act, 2006, the Delhi Cantonment Board was governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924 which provided for seven members on the … ward No. 3 of Delhi Cantt. on 2nd January, 2008 by the Chief Executive Officer of the Delhi Cantonment Board, and have assailed the action of the respondent No. 1 in causing to be published an electoral

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … the time of his election or nomination subject to any of the disqualifications specified in Sub-section (2) of Section 28 or in Section 29; or(b) has absented himself for more than three consecutive meetings or three months (whichever

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … that no restriction can be placed on the right to vote of encroachers. The Cantonment Board contended that Section 28 of the Act contemplates that a person who was not less than 18 years and who was residing

Mohan Mahavar and ors. and Vijay Kumar Mahavar and anr. Vs. Union of I ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Election

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT407

Jabalpur Cantonment Board.2. The relevant facts briefly are that the Cantonments Act, 1924 was replaced by a new Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the 2006 Act') by Parliament. The 2006 Act was brought into force by notification dated 18-12-2006. … to be represented by official members, they were not entitled to elect their representatives. He next submitted that Section 28(1) of the 2006 Act provides that the person who has resided in the Cantonment for a period of

Lt. Col. Narendra Kumar Kakkar (Retd.) Vs. Nissar Khan Ibrahim Khan an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 28(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1988(4)BomCR475; 1989MhLJ38

of the Board since he had incurred prior to the election a disqualification under section 28(2)(h) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter called 'the said Act'). The alleged disqualification is on the ground that the first respondent had … not remediless and that would further buttress the above view. [Jagannath Singh v Dr. Ajay Upadyay & anr 2006 Cri LJ 4274; 2006 (5) AIR Bom R held per incuriam]. - The election of the first respondent

P. Narasimha Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD784; 2002(6)ALT612

required to be formally published in Census - fee can be imposed on basis of provisional publication. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … order, specify. Section 17 : Grant of Exclusive privilege of manufacture, etc. :--(1) Subject to the provisions of Section 28 and any rules made in this behalf, the Government may, subject to such conditions as they may deem

E. Anand Kumar Vs. Dr. A. Narahari Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 41, Rules 27(1) and 28

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD680; 2002(6)ALT356

- appellant Court reasonable in allowing amendment application in terms of provisions of Code of Civil Procedure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … adopted by the appellate Court. The procedure laid down under Section 107, Order 41, Rule 27(1)(b) and Rule 28 CPC are relevant provisions. Section 107 CPC reads:'107. (1) Subject to such conditions and limitations as may be

Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 18 and 28A

Reported in : 2004(3)ALD786

held, award passed in violation of Section 28 A - claimants directed to refund amount with interest. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Pagadala Pedda Yadaiah S/O Late Ramaiah and ors. Vs. K. Annapurna W/O ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 28 and 28(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 21, Rule 32

Reported in : 2001(5)ALT417

deposit balance sale consideration without giving notice to defendant as plaintiff failed to pay within stipulated time. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … CRP 1500/2000 is directed against the order in E.A. 19/2000.6. Meanwhile, the revision petitioners filed an application under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act for rescission of the agreement of sale dated 10.10.95, which is pending.7. Heard

Sri Venkata Saasta Jewellers Vs. Commercial Tax Officer (intelligence) ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 28(6)

Reported in : [2003]129STC364(AP)

into matter conducted by appropriate authority as to whether there were grounds for confiscation of seized articles. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and seize the articles, in so far as passing an order of confiscation is concerned, as provided under Section 28(6) of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), before passing a confiscation