Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 274 · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 18 2006

Anand Prakash Agrawal Son of Shri Dhan Prakash Agrawal Vs. Cantonment ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-18-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 19 and 20; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 185 and 274; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2854

Matched in: Citation 2006(3)AWC2854

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 1917

Emperor Vs. Piari Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-10-1917

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1917)ILR39All309

will be refunded. Act (Local) No. II of 1916 (United Provinces Municipalities Act), Section 274 - 'Occupier.' - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2006

Cantonment Board Vs. Smt. Sudarshan Mala JaIn and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-25-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC4098

Matched in: Citation 2006(4)AWC4098

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 23 2019

Cantonment Board,meerut . Vs. Afzal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-23-2019

Subject : Education

originally governed by the 1924 Act. The said Act is repealed by virtue of Section 360 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short, ‘the 2006 Act’). The 2006 Act came into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006.4. Before the new Act has … of the unauthorised construction. Aggrieved by the notice dated 02.09.2006 he has filed statutory appeal as contemplated under Section 274 of the 1924 Act. Appeal also ended in dismissal. In all the cases covered in this group, identical

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1912

Rashik Lal Vs. Ram NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-20-1912

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1912)ILR34All273

No, IX of 1872 (Indian Contract Act), Section 39 - Contract--Mortgage--Part of consideration unpaid--Effect of such non-payment. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (see 18 Madras, 126 ; Punjab Record for 1907, p. 274 ; 10 C.W.N., 923), and that the whole of the mortgaged property cannot be foreclosed. There is no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2002

Puppala Seetaramaiah Vs. Superintendent, Sub-jail and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-24-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Limitation Act

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD584; 2003(4)ALT549; 2003CriLJ2978

moved to Court after expiry of period - held, no enquiry for ascertainment of compensation be commenced. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2007

Debashish Soren Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through the Chief Secretary ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-02-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Jharkhand Municipal (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 1; Ranchi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 1; Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2000 - Sections 1; Constitution of India - Articles 243M, 243ZC, 243ZF, 244 and 368; Bihar Panchayat Raj Act; Bihar Municipal Act, 1922; Re-organisation Act, 2000 - Sections 85; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992 - Sections 5

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR542(Jhr)]

is being passed. In these three writ petitions, Sub-section (ii) of Section 1 of the Jharkhand Municipal (Amendment) Act, 2006 and Sub-section (ii) of Section 1 of the Ranchi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 2006 are being challenged by … may by notification direct. (4) Notwithstanding any thing in Sub-section (2), it shall not take effect in any cantonment or part of a cantonment without the consent of Central Government previously obtained.(xi) There is no dispute in … of decision of Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in AIR 1995 AP 274.(ix) The same reasoning would apply to the present case also. The State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

Khaja Kutubuddin Khan S/O Late Khaja Moi Vs. The Secunderabad Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-19-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

said premises without notice and without following due process of law, contrary to the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (referred to as new Act) and in violation of Article 300- A of the constitution of India. Petitioners … 248, 320 and 340 of the new Act (Sections 185, 256 and 274 of the old Act), it is clear that an aggrieved person can … late Khaja Moinuddin Khan R/o 699, Khaja Mansion, Road No.36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad and another Petitioners The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Court compound, S P Road, SEcunderabad Rep by its Chief Executive Officer and others . Respondents Counsel … was established and was functioning for long time. On 6.4.2001 notice under Section 185 of Cantonment Act 1924 (referred to as Old Act) was issued

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2018

Delhi Jal Board vs.vimal Kumar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-05-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

refer, with advantage, in this connection, to a judgement of a Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board v Central Government Industrial Tribunal, 2006 (88) DRJ75(DB), authored by the learned Chief Justice Markandeya Katju, J.(as … Wages Employees' Assn. v. State of Karnataka, (1990) 2 SCC396:1990. SCC (L&S) 274 arising out of industrial adjudication has been considered in State of Karnataka … of the WP (C) 11041/2004 Page 1 respondent to be violative of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”) and, consequently, directs reinstatement of the respondent with full back

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial