Advanced Search Results

Thondi Ram Vs. Lachman

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All382

execution'--Act XV of 1877 (Limitation Act), Schedule ii., No. 179 (4)--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 223, 228, 273. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Debi Sahai Vs. Daulat

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1927All346

the plea taken by the defendant, follow the procedure laid down by Section 273 of the Act. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Ramanand Vs. the Bank of Bengal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All377

1859, Section 273 - Act XX of 1866, Section 52--Act VIII of 1871, Sections 53, 54, 55--Appeal--Execution--Procedure--Repeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Secunderabad Cantonment Board.... Vs. Narinder Kumar Dhingra and Othe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Cantonment Board had issued a notice dated 19.01.2011 to the respondents/writ petitioners under Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short the Act) directing respondents to stop erection/re-erection of the building and remove unauthorized structures shown in … an order, other than an order contained in a notice issued under section 144, section 183, section 238, section 273 or section 302, where the appellate authority so directs, all proceedings to enforce the order and all prosecutions

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … effect” on that date. See Young v. Fordice , 520 U. S. 273 , 282-283. Pp. 10-12. (b) While not controlling here, three precedents addressing … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

Ashok Pandey, Advocate Vs. State of U.P. Through Its Secretary, Higher ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15 (4), 16, 16 (4) and 226; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 28 (5); Uttar Pradesh State Universities Reservation Order, 1994; Uttar Pradesh State Universities (Reservation in Admission for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Order, 1994

Reported in : AIR1996All24

not aggrieved person to challenge policy of university reservation - his only intention is to get admission. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to the law declared by Supreme Court in Indira Sawhney v. Union of India, 1992 (6) JT (SC) 273 (Mandal Commission Case).3. Having heard the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel we are of the view that

Gauri Shankar Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1930All26

by a Bench of Honorary Magistrate on 12th December 1928. The fine, if paid, should be refunded. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … blind lane which is used by the occupants of two other houses bearing the Municipal Nos. 272 and 273. The learned Sessions Judge has very clearly described the position and boundary of the disputed site.It abuts on

Uda Begam Vs. Imam-ud-dIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : LimitationProperty

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All82

plot in question in this appeal are reversed, and the claim is decreed. Equitable Estoppel - Laches--Acquieseence--Limitation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … vested in the plaintiffs at the period of suit'--Peddamuthulaty v. N. Timma Reddy 2 Mad. H.C.R. at p. 273; but where there is more than mere laches, where there is conduct or language inducing a reasonable belief

Mohinder Kaur Bajaj and ors. Vs. Dda and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a house or have not been allotted on hire-purchase basis a residential flat in Delhi/New Delhi or Delhi Cantonment. If, however, individual share of the applicant in the jointly owned plot or land under the residential house … acquisition of the aforesaid property, she filed her return of income under Section 39(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1962 in Form No.2C for the Assessment Year 2002-03, declaring a gross income of ` 5,095.27.5. The Petitioners

Puppala Seetaramaiah Vs. Superintendent, Sub-jail and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Limitation Act

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD584; 2003(4)ALT549; 2003CriLJ2978

moved to Court after expiry of period - held, no enquiry for ascertainment of compensation be commenced. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of hearing, he never complained about the harassment meted out to him in the Cell by the co-accused. 273-274' (para 37). On grounds of public policy the Court applies the principles of res judicata to writ petitions