Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 272 · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.029 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 04 2018

Rajbir Singh vs.commissioner of Police & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-04-2018

Subject : Education

No.2 for unauthorised construction and notice against the respondent No.2 was framed under Section 247 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 wherein he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to fine to the tune of ₹10,000/- and cost towards demolition … FIR was registered as a counterblast to the action taken by the petitioner of issuing notice to the Cantonment Board on 26th October, 2015 asking them to take action against the unauthorized construction done by respondent No.2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2014

Union of India and anr. Vs. Dinshaw Shapoorji Anklesari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

also agree to abide by any orders and rules that may be passed regarding tenure of land in cantonments. Place: Poona Dated: April 1971 Signature of the purchaser of Bungalow No.1-A, Elphinstone Road Sy. No.258 Poona Cantonment. … Civil Suit No.695 of 99, the appellants preferred Civil Appeal No.26 of 2006 in the District Court, Pune.26. In Civil Appeal No.26 of 2006, the … agreement for occupation by Government of the property in a cantonment not requisitioned under the Cantonment (House Accommodation) Act known as “Repairing Lease” was entered between Maneckji Nasserwanji Anklesaria in one part (First Part) and the Governor … are entitled to protections of eviction as per the provisions of sub section 3 of Section 12 of the Bombay Rent Act. The defendants were

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2005

Associated Auto Service Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-13-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(4), 14(8) and 22; Income Tax Act - Sections 34; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2006]144STC623(AP)

Matched in: Citation [2006]144STC623(AP)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 1929

Gauri Shankar Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-02-1929

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1930All26

by a Bench of Honorary Magistrate on 12th December 1928. The fine, if paid, should be refunded. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … is a blind lane which is used by the occupants of two other houses bearing the Municipal Nos. 272 and 273. The learned Sessions Judge has very clearly described the position and boundary of the disputed site.It

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2006

Boddu Satyavathi Vs. Boddu Ramakrishna Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-07-2006

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16 and 20(2); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 7; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD591; 2007(3)ALT417

passed by the trial Court regarding the alternative relief stands. Each party shall bear their own costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that he has paid Rs. 1,500/- to the defendant and is willing to pay the balance of Rs. 272/- to him but he had not paid the sum of Rs. 1,500/- to the defendant, the plaintiff is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2012

Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-26-2012

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Section 3, 4; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Section 5(1), 6, 11(5), 11(2), 11(4), 17A, 17A(3), 2, 4(3), 4A, 15, 10(1), 13(2)(e), 16(1)(b), 17(1), 17A(1)(A), 18A(6), 21(5), 28, 30, 11, 7, 16(1), 9, 13(2)(a), 13, 18A(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Rules 1960 - Rule 59(2), 58; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Section 84, 85, 86, 3, 4(a); Central Act 67 of 1957 - Sections 16(1)(b), 17, 13, 9; U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 ; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Section 2; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115;

21, 1962 and February 28, 1969 issued by the Government of Bihar and the Notification dated October 27, 2006 issued by the Government of Jharkhand null and void and (iv) directing the respondents to proceed under Rule … lease to each of the appellants in the iron ore bearing areas in Ghatkuri as applied.Bihar Land Reforms Act3. Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (for short, ‘1950 Bihar Act’) came to be enacted by the Bihar Legislature … the State and its consequences. The State Government has been empowered under Section 3 to declare that the estates or tenures of a proprietor or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial