Advanced Search Results
The Collector of Bareilly Vs. Gulzari Lal and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1875)ILR1All596
VIII of 1859 (Civil Procedure Code), ss.270-309 - suit--Attachment in execution of decree--Court Fees--Prerogaice of the Crown. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano
Delhi
May-09-2017
Land Acquisition
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate 1. These thirteen petitions presented under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority … versus ASHOK GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate + CRL.L.P. 270/2015 Through: Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD CORAM:
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChhote Lal Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Jul-21-1944
Criminal
AIR1945All16
in this connexion be made to Kapoor Chaud v. Suraj Prasad The application for revision is dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the opinion of the learned Counsel, the prosecution appeared to have been instituted without the consent mentioned in Section 270 (1), Government of India Act of 1935. No such point was raised in either of the Courts below.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Executive Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board Vs. Auro Swamy and or ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-29-2007
Property
Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 179 and 181; Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976; Public Premises (Eviction or Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 151 - Order 41
2007(4)ALD796; 2007(5)ALT786
action according to the plaintiffs is contrary to the provisions of the law and especially that of the Cantonments Act, as no notice of show-cause has been issued, therefore, entire such action on their part is totally illegal. … been granted after expiry of the statutory period, therefore, they had commenced erection of the sheds in September, 2006. While the work was in progress the officials of defendants 1 and 2 without any prior notice or … without making a formal application and obtaining a permission as required under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act no person can raise any structure. Further, … portions in premises bearing Nos. 186, 186/A, 186/A/1, 186/B in Sy. No. 270 situated in Thokatta Village, Bowenpally, Secunderabad. Having purchased the same under three
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBranch Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bhumani Vapatamma and ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-18-1996
Motor Vehicles
1998ACJ1235
the vehicle. In the peculiar circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs in these appeals. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Co. 1977 ACJ 343 (SC), which is followed in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jugal Kishore 1988 ACJ 270 (SC). In Pushpabai's case (supra), the Court was dealing with the effect of Sections 95(1)(a) and (b) (i)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Md. Masoom Vs. S.K. Khader Vali and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-30-2003
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 165 and 166
II(2004)ACC794; 2005ACJ1802; 2004(2)ALD324
incurred to his business as a consequence of accident apart from claiming for damages caused to vehicles. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Judge has referred to the decisions reported in Manager, NIAC Ltd, v. M. Prasada Rao, 1997 (2) ALD 270, as well as R.D. Hattangadi v. Pest Control (India) Pvt., Ltd., : [1995]1SCR75 . He has also referred
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.E.i. Consultancy and anr. Vs. Modi World Infotech and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-20-2002
CriminalBanking
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 397(2), 397(3) and 482
2002(1)ALT(Cri)517; 2002CriLJ2731
be said to be an abuse of process of Court.11. In the result, the petition is dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … recent decision of the Supreme Court reported in Smt. Chand Dhavan v. Jawahar Lal, 1992 (1) SVLR (CR) 270 : (1992 Cri LJ 1956). The Supreme Court in this case has reiterated once again the well settled
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4, Chennai Vs. M/s. Mansi Fin ...
Chennai
Sep-01-2016
Direct Taxation
decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Smt. Savita Rani [2004] 270 ITR 40/[2003] 133 Taxman 712and has observed and held as under : "8. It is well settled in … (a) and (b) of Section 2(14)(iii) of the Act. i.e. within the jurisdiction of a municipality or a cantonment board having population of not less than ten thousand or in an area not being more than eight
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanachur Islamic Education Trust (R) Vs. The Ministry of Health and Fa ...
Delhi
Sep-01-2015
Education
Bar Association (Regd.) Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi 196 (2013) DLT 270; Meenakshi College of Pharmacy and Research Centre Vs. All India Council For … All India Council For Technical Education 201 (2014) DLT 422 and to Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board AIR 2015 Delhi 38. Seen in this light it would follow that MCI as recommendatory authority/body, before … came up first was that the UOI was in violation of Section 10A(4) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (MCI Act) for the reason of having not granted an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner after
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›