Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 27 · Page 1 of about 430 results (0.057 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2016

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-2016

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … It is pure and simple, a statutory right.” 11. As the right to elect is dealt with in Section 27 and 28 of the Act they are reproduced as under:“27. Electoral rolls.-. (1) The Board or, where a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2007

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … Panchayats, which work within the framework of Part IX of the Constitution. The petitioners have also referred to Section 27(2)(a) of the 1950 Act and pleaded that exclusion of the Gram Sabhas from the purview of the local

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2002

T. Manemma Vs. Bokki Shivanna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27 and 27(1)

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD760; 2003(2)ALT47

Order of Appellate Court allowing additional evidence is bad in law and is struck down as irregular. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Wanaparthy in A.S. No. 10 of 2000. In that appeal, he filed a petition under Order XLI Rule 27 C.P.C., requesting the court to appoint a commissioner 'to record the evidence of the Expert on his report

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 24 1959

Deoman Upadhyaya Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-24-1959

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14 and 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 27, 161, 162 and 162(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : AIR1960All1; 1960CriLJ1

principles of Article 14 -Section 162 (2) as much it relates to Section 27 also becomes void. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1997

CaptaIn C.P. Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-21-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC49; (1997)3UPLBEC1702

be held bad on grounds of no reasons provided - Central Government justified in rejecting statutory complaint. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … is the non-selection of the petitioner for grant of permanent commission and rejection of his statutory complaint under Section 27 of the Army Act. 1950- The first contention advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 1990

Har Chandi and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-24-1990

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 27(3) and (4); Constitution of India - Article 39; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 198 and 198(3); Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 28C

Reported in : AIR1991All24

designed to attain the goal of distributive justice - in relation to material resources of the community. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … dated 25th July, 1979 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut, in exercise of powers under S. 27(4) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, hereinafter called the Ceiling Act, whereby the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2000

Vidyanand Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-24-2000

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : U.P. Municipalities (Reservation and Allotment of Seats and Officers) Rules, 1994 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 226; U.P. Municipalities Act - Sections 9A and 296

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC46; (2001)1UPLBEC513

seats amounts to more than 27% - held, only 7 sets to be reserved and not 8. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1992

Hemendra Chaudhury Vs. M/S. Punjab National Bank and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-07-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 13, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : AIR1993All49

1908 - Trial Court allowed filing of documents after the completion of arguments - revision not maintainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … opinion that analogy of cases in respect of adducing of additional evidence in appeal under Order 41, Rule 27, C.P.C. can be extended to the cases where the trial Court allows production of documentary evidence under Order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2001

Vif Airways Ltd. and anr. Vs. Aishu Finance Ltd. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-09-2001

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)941; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)102

to receive notice to escape from liability - held, notice deemed to be served under Section 27. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2001

Ramana theatre, Anantapur Vs. Asstt. Commercial Tax Officer-i (E.T.Tax ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-24-2001

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Entertainment Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 16; Andhra Pradesh Entertainment Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 27(10); Andhra Pradesh Entertainment Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1987

Reported in : AIR2001AP458

pay tax for whole of financial year at contract rate in terms of agreement entered between parties. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … represented by its Managingpartner Sri O.K. Laxminarayana. The petitioner applied for reduction of seating capacity from 342 to 274 in 1st class and from285 to 225 in 2nd class. The said application was rejected by the Joint

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial