Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 267 · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.099 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 12 1959

Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd., Hargaon Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-12-1959

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 49, 245 and 246; Uttar Pradesh Large Land Holdings Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 11 and 12; Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 251 and 267

Reported in : AIR1960All136

taxation progressive in nature - progressive rate has valid justification - held, Act not discriminatory in nature. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to be levied by the impugned Act is nothing but land revenue and inasmuch as Ss. 251 and 267 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act provided that the land revenue of a Bhumidar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2017

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate 1. These thirteen petitions presented under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority … versus TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate + CRL.L.P. 267/2015 DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD Through: Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus ASHOK

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

In Re: Gur Dayal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All216

of a Magistrate of the First Class, the Magistrate of the District, and the Court of Session. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … hear an appeal against the order of a Magistrate of the First Class requiring security for good behaviour--Section 267 of Act X of 1872.9. It will be thus seen that the Magistrates of the First Class are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 22 1941

inder Bahadur Singh Vs. Sita Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-22-1941

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1941All209

proceed in the manner indicated above. I make no order as to the costs of this revision. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Ram Jas.11. Then there is another case from this Court, Prabati Kunwar v. Mahmud Fatima ('07) 29 All. 267. There the plaintiffs sued as heirs of their father to recover various portions of their father's estate from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Bithal Das Vs. Shankar Das Dube

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All265

Execution of decree - Act No. IX of 1872, (Indian Contract Act) Sections 2(d), 25, Clause (2)70--Contract--Consideration. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 1966

Anand Prakash and anr. Vs. Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-27-1966

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesArbitration

Acts : Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 - Sections 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Co-operative Societies Rules - Rules 115, 116, 117, 118, 122, 123, 126 and 127; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 27 and 27(2)

Reported in : AIR1968All22

in case petition is pending before Arbitrator - pre mature writ cannot be entertained under Article 226. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … The same view has been expressed in Mohd Sulaiman Khan v. Mohd Yar Khan. (1888) ILR 11 All 267 at p 287 (FB) The Co-operative Societies Act and the rules have constituted the arbitrator for a limited

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2018

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Chief Commissioner of I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-02-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as Municipality 11 defined in section 389 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924); Section 10(20A):Omitted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.2002 “10(20A) any income of an … Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women.” 26. The Kishansing Tomar Municipal Corporation Of The City Of Ahmedabad Ad Others, 2006 (8) SCC352 noticing the object and purpose of Constitution 74th Amendment Act, 1992 stated as following: “12. It … in Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti vs. Union of India and another, (2004) 267 ITR460stated following: “A bare perusal of the Explanation of Section 10(20) shows

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2018

Meenu Rani vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-27-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

employed in any establishment.23. He further relied upon the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal & Ors., 129 (2006) DLT610(DB), to WP (C) 7309/2014, WP (C) 7311/2014 … in a government department of State of Haryana who had worked for 267 days prior to his termination in violation of Section 25-F of the … established in that behalf. Equality of opportunity is the hallmark, and the Constitution has provided also for affirmative action to ensure that unequals are not treated as equals. Thus, any public employment has to be in terms … back wages to them.5. The petitioners filed their direct industrial disputes under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short „ID Act‟) against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2018

Shankar Prasad Arya vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-27-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

employed in any establishment.23. He further relied upon the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal & Ors., 129 (2006) DLT610(DB), to WP (C) 7309/2014, WP (C) 7311/2014 … in a government department of State of Haryana who had worked for 267 days prior to his termination in violation of Section 25-F of the … established in that behalf. Equality of opportunity is the hallmark, and the Constitution has provided also for affirmative action to ensure that unequals are not treated as equals. Thus, any public employment has to be in terms … back wages to them.5. The petitioners filed their direct industrial disputes under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short „ID Act‟) against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2018

Rahul Sharma vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-27-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

employed in any establishment.23. He further relied upon the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal & Ors., 129 (2006) DLT610(DB), to WP (C) 7309/2014, WP (C) 7311/2014 … in a government department of State of Haryana who had worked for 267 days prior to his termination in violation of Section 25-F of the … established in that behalf. Equality of opportunity is the hallmark, and the Constitution has provided also for affirmative action to ensure that unequals are not treated as equals. Thus, any public employment has to be in terms … back wages to them.5. The petitioners filed their direct industrial disputes under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short „ID Act‟) against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial