Advanced Search Results

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate 1. These thirteen petitions presented under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority … Advocate Crl. L.P. 70/2015 Etc. Page 2 of 10 + + CRL.L.P. 265/2015 DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD Through: Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus ASHOK

Mukund Ram and ors. Vs. Ajodhia Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property Civil

Reported in : AIR1943All210

that I dismiss this appeal with costs. Leave to appeal by way of letters patent is refused. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … from the decree of the learned Assistant Collector in this case rightly lay to the civil Court under Section 265, Sub-section (3) of the Act which runs as follows:An appeal shall lie to the District Judge from the

Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Board

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 265; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 94(3), 128, 128(1), 129, 131(2) and 131(3); Taxation Law

Reported in : AIR1962All83

reasonable classification - exemption to Nawab of Rampur from payment of water tax - held, exemption valid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … therefore, dismissed withcosts. (i) Municipal Tax - water tax - Section 129 of U.P.Municipalities Act ,1916 and Article 265 of Constitution of India -whether tax or fee- no element of quid-pro-quo - held, it is tax and

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices

Sri. K. Srinivas S/O. Rama Swamy and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. the Government ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 245, 246(3), 254, 254(2) and 265; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act, 2006; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 3A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(31), 53, 53(1), 66, 70, 71, 72(1), 66(1), 84, 86, 87, 86(1), 88(8), 88(9), 192A and 192A(1); Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2) and 4(3); Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 3(4), 3(5) and 8; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 16(6); Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973 - Sections 11; Mysore Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act - Sections 3 and 9; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 22, 42, 123 and 123(1); Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rul

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD241; 2008(4)ALT53

be refunded to them.42. The writ petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Shantilal Mehta v. Custodian : [1998]231ITR871(SC) .TAXES CAN NEITHER BE LEVIED NOR COLLECTED EXCEPT BY AUTHORITY OF LAW:Article 265 of the constitution of India imposes a limitation on the taxing power of the State in so far

A.P. Federation of Chit Funds Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(12) and 65(105); Andhra Pradesh Chit Funds Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 6; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2007 - Sections 65; Chit Funds (Amendment) Act, 1982; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 41(1) and 45I; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226 and 265; Andhra Pradesh Chit Funds Rules

Reported in : 2009[13]STR350

and consequential proceedings dated 18-12-2007 are set aside and accordingly the writ petitions are allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … No. HAST 141/2007, dated 18-12-2007 issued by the second respondent as being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India and Section 65(12) read with Section 65(105)(zm) of the Finance Act, 1994 and

M. Anuradha Vs. J. Venkatarama

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 23(3)

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD165

that be expedient to meet ends of justice - held, petitioner not entitled to transfer of case. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 23(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of O.P. No. 5 of 2002 and O.P. No. 265 of 2002 filed by the Respondent-husband on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, Medak District and

Hotel Asoka Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer-1, Dept of Comml. Taxes

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 1(2), 3, 5B, 5(2), 6(2), 7 and 30; Kerala Finance Act, 2006 - Sections 2(1); KVAT Act, 2003 - Sections 8; Kerala General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17 and 17(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 226 and 265; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules - Rule 30

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ419; (2009)25VST546(Ker)

other places.6. The Kerala Finance Bill, 2006 was passed by the Kerala State Legislature as 'The Kerala Finance Act, 2006, (Act 22 of 2006) on 19-10-2006. The Act received the assent of the Governor on 24-10-2006 and was … violated the rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners and others like them, who … those situated within One hundred and the are of a municipal corporation forty percentor municipal council or a cantonment(b) in the case of those situated in any One hundred and other place thirty five percent.4. Section 7