Advanced Search Results

V.V. Raghava Reddy Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayats (Declaration of Villages) Rules, 1994 - Rules 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9; Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayats Act, 1994 - Sections 3(2) and 264; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1964; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD512; 1998(6)ALT531

- held, procedure adopted by subordinate authority and correctness of facts appearing in document to be considered. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … not have been considered in the revision for the first time. The scope of revision is stated in Section 264 of the Act. In revision the power of Government is only restricted to satisfy itself about the 'regularity'

M.S. Raju Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 33(1), 80HHC, 120, 142(1), 143(2), 144A, 155, 185, 260A, 263, 263(1), 264 and 264(1); Finance Act, 1988; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(AP)203; [2008]298ITR373(AP)

the I.T.T.A. aggrieved by the order dated December 29, 2006, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyderabad, under Section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2002-03. The appellant in I.T.T.A. No. 74 of 2007, … Constitution of India. The writ petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. However, in the circumstances, with costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … IV of the said Act which concerns 'practice of granting and revoking probates and letters of administration' comprises Section 264 to 304. Section 264 provides that the District Judge shall have jurisdiction in granting and revoking probates and … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v.

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … IV of the said Act which concerns 'practice of granting and revoking probates and letters of administration' comprises Section 264 to 304. Section 264 provides that the District Judge shall have jurisdiction in granting and revoking probates and … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v.

Mysore Urban Development Authority by Its Commissioner, Vs. the Income ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct TaxationProperty

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(14), 194LA, 264 and 271(1); Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2008(4)KCCRSN247; 2008(5)AIRKarR360

only with the demand but also the proposed further penal action, it appears preferred a revision petition under Section 264 before the respondent No. 2 - Commissioner of Income Tax.10. The authority had also sought for stay of … municipality, municipal corporation, notified area committee, town area committee, town committee, or by any other name) or a cantonment board and which has a population of not less than ten thousand according to the last preceding census … clear illustration of situations where even the non-assesses under the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short 'the Act'] can be subjected to harassment by statutory

ShamsuddIn Vs. Abbas Ali

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 21, Rules 35, 35(1), 35(2), 36 and 100

Reported in : AIR1971All117

- possession under rule 36 is given when somebody else other than judgment debtor is in possession. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … sold in execution of a decree. Provisions precisely analogous are to he found embodied in Sections 263 and 264 of the Civil P. C. both of which refer to the delivery of immoveable property covered by a

Barkat-un-nissa Begam Vs. Mahbub Ali Mian and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1920)ILR42All70

surety upon the mortgages redeemed--Limitation Act No. IX of 1908 (Indian Limitation Act), Schedule I, Article 185. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … formed the subject of the connected suit, and are disposed of by our judgment in First Appeal No. 264.3. The only reason for mentioning this fact is because the two suits were tried together, and the evidence

Smt. Imtiaz Bano Vs. Masood Ahmad Jafri and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226(3); Guardian and Wards Act; Mohammedan Law

Reported in : AIR1979All25

of any opportunity to avail it - no alternative remedy available - writ of Habeas Corpus maintainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Co. of India Ltd., Calcutta (reported in AIR 1977 Andh Pra 250) it has been observed (at p. 264) :--'The words 'any other remedy for such redress' are significant and meaningful and they clearly bring out the

Har Prasad and anr. Vs. Jafar Ali

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All345

Section 622 - High Court's powers of revision--'Jurisdiction'--Limitation--Act XV of 1887 (Limitation Act), Schedule ii, No. 164. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Section 622 was taken by the Madras High Court in Subbaji Rau v. Srinivasa Rau I.L.R. 2 Mad. 264 where it was held that where the lower Court had failed to do so, the High Court was

Association of State Road Transport Undertaking Vs. Devender Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Labour Court must be upheld. He relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: (a) Delhi Cantonment Board vs. Central Industrial Tribunal & Ors. 129 (2006) DLT610(b) Union of India vs. Ramchander & Anr. (2005) … In M.P. Admn. v. Tribhuban [(2007) 9 SCC748: (2008) 1 SCC (L&S) 264]. this Court upheld the order of the Industrial Court passed in its … the conclusion that the termination of the respondent was without compliance of Section 25(F) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). On the basis of such a conclusion on the issue No.1,