Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 263 · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 31 1969

Queen-empress Vs. Mukundi Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1899)ILR21All189

Code, Section 263 - Summary trial--Matters necessary to be stated m the record of a summary trial. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1982

Dandoo Madanmohan Rao Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-09-1982

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(2), 10, 23, 25A, 33A, 33B, 143, 144, 171 and 171(2)

Reported in : (1983)34CTR(AP)109

held, Orders passed by Commissioner was not question of law which arose out of Order of Tribunal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … void - brothers along with assessee were coparceners and entitled to share in family properties - Commissioner under Section 263 can issue notice to any of coparcener and no requirement to issue notice to assessee's wife and daughter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1985

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Khalid Mehdi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-12-1985

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31)

Reported in : (1986)57CTR(AP)110; [1987]165ITR685(AP)

be reopened and accordingly question of assessing assessee in status of an 'association of persons' cannot arise. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … for the years 1971-72 and 1972-73 had become final. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax invoking his powers under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, set aside the assessment made against Arif Mehdi Khan and Khalid Mehdi Khan, and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 09 2001

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sree Rama Agricultural Poultry Farm

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-09-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 260A

Reported in : [2002]258ITR336(AP)

on question of fact - appeal deserves to be dismissed as not involving any question of law. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … depreciation on cages is prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, by virtue of the power conferred under Section 263 of the Act. The assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal. The learned Tribunal on appreciation of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2005

Y. Venkateswar Rao and ors. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-28-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 263 and 263(1); Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 516, 521, 521(1), 528, 539, 596, 622, 622(2), 623 and 625; Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Act, 1979; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970; Punjab Municipalities Act, 1976 - Sections 90(4); Excise Law; Andhra Pradesh Excise Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD445; 2006(1)ALT443

Matched in: Citation 2006(1)ALD445; 2006(1)ALT443

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2014

Rohit Gera Vs. Pune Cantonment Board Golibar Maidan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

dated 21st May, 2009 issued by respondent No.1 Pune Cantonment Board issued under Section 248 (1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act” for short), order dated 30th November, 2013 passed in Appeal preferred … High Court in the case of Ram Swaroop Gupta Vs. Cantonment Board Lucknow reported in AIR 1961 Allahabad 263 it was submitted that replacing the roof with a view to prevent leakage did not amount to any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2005

Fertilizers, Pesticides and Seeds Dealers Welfare Association Vs. Muni ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-17-2005

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 260, 263 and 328

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD574; 2006(2)ALT108

Matched in: Citation 2006(1)ALD574; 2006(2)ALT108

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2005

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Brij Bala

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-11-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(1), 256(1), 256(2) and 263

Reported in : [2005]274ITR33(All)

in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. There will be no order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … The Tribunal relying upon Circular No. 176, dated August 28, 1987, had set aside the order passed under Section 263 of the Act. The Tribunal was further of the opinion that on close perusal of the statement of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 1998

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.B. Jai Singh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-23-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72, 75, 77(1) and 263

Reported in : [1999]237ITR513(AP)

assessment year. Income Tax Act 1961 s.72 Income Tax Act 1961 s.75 Income Tax Act 1961 s.77 - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … against the partner's own income from other sources. Therefore, he revised the order of the Income-tax Officer under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act.5. Against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax, the assessee filed an appeal before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1969

Rahim Bux and ors. Vs. Mohammad Shafi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-29-1969

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 263(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47

Reported in : AIR1971All16

the meaning of Section 108 (e) - lease does not become impossible to perform under Section 56. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … first place the demolition of a building by the landlord, even though in pursuance of a notice under Section 263(1) of the U. P. Municipalities Act, cannot be said to be a destruction of the premises by an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial