Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 262 · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 2015

Tarun Batra and Anr Vs. Roopa Sood

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-15-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

of land occupied by different parties, each of whom has a right in it”.20. Section 2(zm) of The Cantonments Act, 2006 defines party wall as follows:“party-wall means a wall forming part of a building and used or constructed to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2004

Dr. A. Krishna Veni Vs. Registrar, Ntr University of Health Sciences a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-18-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Medical Colleges (Admission into Post-Graduate Medical Courses) Rules, 1997 - Rule 10

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD590

order.12. The writ petition, with the above observations and directions, is disposed of, without any to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Sri Venkateswara University (SVU) local area. In M.D. (Anaesthesia), in the first counselling, the BC candidate with rank 262 belonging to Andhra University (AU) local area was admitted to the unreserved (non-local) seat as a service candidate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1941

Mirza Hidayat Beg Vs. Seth Behari Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-1941

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : AIR1941All225

in the Court below. The appeal fails and is dismissed; parties to bear their own costs throughout. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 258 and In re Tetley; Attorney General v. National Provincial and Union Bank of England (1924) 1924 A.C. 262. Questions of indefiniteness also do arise where trust is for a vague or indefinite purpose like 'dhararn', 'philanthropy',

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 2013

M/S.Vijay Cements, Vs. 1.The Additional Director General

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-14-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Zonal Unit C-3, "C" Wing, Rajaji Bhavan Beasant Nagar, Chenna”090. 2.The Commissioner of Central Excise No.1, Wiliams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirapall”001. ... Respondents PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue … documents, computers' CPUs, pen-drives, Compact Discs and floppies and those items were seized under mahazars. The follow up actions were conducted on 21.12.2006, 22.12.2006, 23.12.2006, 12.02.2007, 13.02.2007 and 14.02.2007 with suppliers of raw materials and dealers of … "After hearing Counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that Section 11A needs to be read with Section 35Q. In the case of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2008

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-27-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … a state court.” Branch v. Smith , 538 U. S. 254 , 262 (2003). See also Hathorn v. Lovorn , 457 U. S. 255 , … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1941

Mohammad Yusuf and ors. Vs. Azim-uddIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-11-1941

Subject : Family Trusts and Societies

Reported in : AIR1941All235

and the decree of the trial Court are hereby affirmed and the appeal is dismissed with costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … v. Davis (1923) 1 Ch. 225 and Attorney-General v. National Provincial Bank of England, Ltd (1924) 1924 A.C. 262. If, however, the executor is directed to apportion the property between undefined charitable and non-charitable objects, so that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2024

In Re : T.n. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-16-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

approached the Madhya Pradesh High Court by filing Writ Petition No.14478 of 2006 seeking a direction to the respondents to favourably consider the prayer of … High Court vide interim order passed in W.P. No.5937 of 2002, directed that the order of exclusion of Cantonment and Civil/Nazul area of Pachmarhi Town and 33 revenue villages from the Pachmarhi Sanctuary and settlement of rights … by virtue of the directions issued 2 by the CEC vide letter dated 2nd July, 2004, no commercial activity was permissible thereupon, without the permission of this Court.4. Much water has flown during pendency of the original … S.No.DATE EVENT1 01.06.1977 The Government of Madhya Pradesh notified Pachmarhi Sanctuary under Section 18(1) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 but did not specify/demarcate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2006

Anil Lakra and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-14-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 324, 342, 366, 375, 376, 376(2), 379, 411 and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 162 and 164; ;Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4467

v. State of Punjab reported in (2006) 1 SCC (Cri) 191 : 2006 Cri LJ 126 and Rajinder Chandra v. State of Chhattisgarh reported in … by the male organ of generation (Stephen's 'Criminal Law' 9th Ed. P. 262). In 'Encyclopaedia of Crime and Justice' (Volume 4, page 1356) 4t is … (PW 3) along with his girl friend, the victim, daughter of Lt. Col. R.B. Singh of Binnaguri Army Cantonment within P.S. Banarhat, left the said cantonment at about 18.45 hours on a motor cycle and arrived at … to non-production of general diary and papers of Military Hospital. Adverse presumption under Section 114(g) of the Evidence Act should be drawn against prosecution for non-production of general diary which was the real FIR.38. We are not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2011

State of Himachal Pradesh. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131, 262 (2), 363, 3; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 78, 54(3); Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 23 Rule 6(a); Government of India Act, 1935 - Section 290-A; States Merger (Chief Commissioners Provinces) Order, 1949; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Section 11; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970 - Section 38

inter state rivers, namely, Satluj and Beas, and is barred under Article 262 (2) of the Constitution. Mr. Vaidyanathan, learned counsel appearing for the Defendant … units of the Indian Union was sovereign and independent in the sense the American colonies or the Swiss Cantons were before they formed their federal unions. The Constituent Assembly of India, deriving its power from the sovereign … were united to form a new State of Himachal Pradesh under the Himachal Pradesh and Bilaspur (New States) Act, 1954. The new State of Himachal Pradesh, however, continued to be a Part-C State until it became a … power generated in the Bhakra-Nangal and Beas Projects has been acknowledged by Section 78 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 titled “Rights and Liabilities in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2011

Maha Laxmi Cable Network Vs. Zee Turner Ltd.

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : May-12-2011

Subject : MRTP

signals in terms of Clause 4.1 of Interconnection Regulation dated 4th September, 2006 issued by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India.” 4. A public notice was … Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd. in Petition No. 262 of 2009 decided on 10.12.2009, this Tribunal opined: … Kalu Vajra/Kalera Village Dhoolkot All the above villages are situated in the State of Punjab i.e.beyond the Ambala Cantonment Area. 13. We may also notice, in this behalf, the area of operation of the petitioner as stated … hereby made clear by Second Party that Second Party shall have all the rights to take appropriate legal action against First Party, in case of any default in making assured payment, as per the terms and conditions … having regard to the fact that the requirements of the provisions of Sections 65A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act have not been satisfied

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial