Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 261 · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.021 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K. Babu Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181A, 181(3), 194 and 194(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD330

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter-affidavit are not … that sub-section.12. This is not a case concerned with building permission but only permission to raise compound wall. Section 261 of Act 41 of 2006 corresponds to Section 194 of the Act, which deals with boundary walls, hedges

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K.S. Ashok Kumar S/O. Late Sri K. Sailoo Vs. the Cantonment Execut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181(3), 181A, 194 and 194(2); Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD580

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter affidavit are … that sub-section.15. This is not a case concerned with building permission but only permission to raise compound wall. Section 261 of Act 41 of 2006 corresponds to Section 194 of the Act, which deals with boundary walls, hedges

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2001

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Palaniappa Dyeing Unit

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-09-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1) and 261

Reported in : [2001]119TAXMAN687(AP)

consideration of Supreme Court - held, application for grant of leave to appeal before Supreme Court allowed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … has filed this application for grant of leave to appeal to Supreme Court of India in terms of Section 261 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. The factual matrix of the matter lies in a very narrow compass.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 31 1969

Ganga Bai Vs. Sita Ram

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All170

in this case impose on him personal liability of maintaining the appellant. Hindu Law - Hindu widow--Maintenance. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … must be in the negative. In the case of Lalti Kuar v. Ganga Bishan H.C.R. N.W.P. 1875 p. 261, to which allusion is made in the referring order, I assented, not without doubt and hesitation, to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2006

Mamatha Chit Fund P. Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Smt. Doure Swarropa Ran ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-2006

Subject : CivilCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 397, 398, 433, 446, 446(1), 446(2), 446(3), 456, 457 and 644; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153, 166, 177 and 221; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 2(2), 4, 8, 15, 19 to 49 and 50; Central Act; Mysore Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Articles 1 and 11; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8

Reported in : [2007]136CompCas758(AP); [2007]80SCL69(AP)

set off shall come into operation only on payment of the requisite court fees as discussed hereinabove. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Act, 1958.17. In Punjab Finance P. Ltd. (in liquidation) v. Malhara Singh (No. 2) [1975] 45 Comp Cas 261 (P & H) ; [1975] Tax LR 1670, a learned single judge of the Punjab and Haryana High

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2014

People's Movement for Civic Action through Its General Secretary, Patr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Feb-26-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the VP that the construction was not made by respondent No.6 until 2006 or even later. Hence the initial sanction/approval/permission/licence of 31st May, 1995 has … the Constitution of India. In the judgment reported in 2001(1) Bom.C. R. 261 in the case of Sadanand S. Varde and others V/s State of … upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay Vs. Cantonment Board and Ors., Pune being SLP No. 647 of 1992 Jt 1992(4) SC 538 with other matters in … the Town and Country Planning Department, respondent No.4, (TP) under Section 44 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (TP Act) and the Village Panchayat Curea, Bambolim and Talaolim, Tiswadi, Goa, respondent No.2, (VP) under Regulation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2006

Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. District Judge (incharge) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-27-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92, 115, 115(1), 115(2), 115(3) and 115(4) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A, 3A, 4 and 10 - Order 43, Rule 1; General Clauses Act;

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3281

Matched in: Citation 2006(4)AWC3281

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2014

Municipal Labour Union and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

alternative to Octroi. However, this recommendation of 2002 though acted upon in 2006 miserably failed and the State Government permitted the Municipal Corporations except Navi … 1987 SC 1059 B.K.Srinivasan v/s State of Karnataka. (4) AIR 1990 SC 261 Sundarjas Kanyalal Bhathija v/s the Collector, Thane. (5) (1996) 6 SCC 634 … word 'Municipality' cover Municipal Corporation. This view has been taken by the Apex Court in the case of Cantonment Board, Secunderabad v. G. Venketram Reddy, AIR 1995 SC 1210. Article 243R deals with composition of Municipalities. Article … legality and validity of Section 127(2)(aaa), Section 99 (partly) and Section 152T of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and now the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act. The provisions as particularly indicated in the prayer clauses together

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial