Advanced Search Results

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

2(20) of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined … by respondent No. 3 by filing Appeal No. 20 of 2005 before the School Tribunal at Solapur, under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 (for short, ''MEPS Act').

Hotel Asoka Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer-1, Dept of Comml. Taxes

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 1(2), 3, 5B, 5(2), 6(2), 7 and 30; Kerala Finance Act, 2006 - Sections 2(1); KVAT Act, 2003 - Sections 8; Kerala General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17 and 17(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 226 and 265; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules - Rule 30

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ419; (2009)25VST546(Ker)

other places.6. The Kerala Finance Bill, 2006 was passed by the Kerala State Legislature as 'The Kerala Finance Act, 2006, (Act 22 of 2006) on 19-10-2006. The Act received the assent of the Governor on 24-10-2006 and was … Commissioner of Income Tax 2005 (4) KLT Short Notes 21, Case No. 26. In the said decision, the court has stated:The intention of the legislature … those situated within One hundred and the are of a municipal corporation forty percentor municipal council or a cantonment(b) in the case of those situated in any One hundred and other place thirty five percent.4. Section 7

Smt.Komal Rugwani. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - Sections 39(2), 39, 40, 8, 9(1) ; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Regulation Act, 1977 (MEPS) - Sections 9, 2(11), 2(25), 2(24), 2(21), 2(20)

of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board. 19. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. "Cantonment" is defined … employed in a private primary school recognised by a body or officer referred to in sub-section (2) of section 39 of the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 can approach the Tribunal under section 9 of the MEPS … as Asst.teacher. She was working in the primary school. By order dated 26-11-2007 her services were terminated by the management on the ground that she

Adusumilli Venkateshwara Rao and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Prade ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 - Rule 26(2); Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD464

can impose reasonable restrictions in interest of general public - such restrictions do not infringe fundamental rights. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … fee to the Government as envisaged in G.O.Ms. No. 243, Industries and Commerce, dated 8-5-1986 amending the Rule 26(2) of Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966. In the absence of production of such evidence the normal

G. Mutyalu Vs. Managing Director, Apsrtc, Hyderabad and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Employees (CCA) Regulations, 1967 - Regulation 18(2); Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1963 - Regulations 26 and 28

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD432; 1998(6)ALT23

order keeping circular guidelines in mind along with necessity to continue petitioner under suspension pending departmental enquiry. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … more than 48 hours - no information to superior - charges of misconduct under Regulations 18 (2) and 26 - person deemed to have been suspended from date of detention order - Court directed authority to review

M. Radha Krishna Murthy Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 309; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 24 and 26

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD132; 2003(2)ALT24

- extension granted for passing examination and extension of period of probation cannot result in losing seniority. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … combined seniority list of Regional Transport Officers issued by the Transport Commissioner, A.P., Hyderabad in MemoNo. 6582/C4/2000, dated 26.5.2000 and the provisional seniority list of the Deputy Transport Commissioners issued in Memo No. 6520/C4/2000, dated 31.5.2000. The

J.P. Subbamma Vs. N. Ravi Kumar Reddy and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 26, Rules 9 and 18 - Order 39, Rule 7(1)

Reported in : 2001(6)ALT101

application of appointment in view of fact that plaintiff taking advantage of interim Orders by making constructions. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … against the order of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur allowing I.A.No.941 of 2000 - filed under Order 26, Rule 9 CPC - in O.S.No.291 of 2000. 2. That suit was filed by the petitioner-plaintiff for permanent

Sardar Singh Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 165(1), 166, 168 and 169; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 5, Rules 9 to 13 and 15 to 33 - Order IX - Order XIII, Rule 3 to 10 - Order 13 - Order 26, Rules 2 to 21 - Order 16 - Order XVII - Order 18 - Order 23, Rules 1 to 3 - Order 26, Rule 4; Uttar Pradesh Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 1967 - Rules 12 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Uttar Pradesh Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Act, 1939 - Sections 111A

Reported in : 1992ACJ463; AIR1992All33

4 would apply to the proceedings before Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal - held, not applicable -Revision Dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under S. 166 of the Act has power to issue Commission to examine witnesses, as provided under 0. 26, R. 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short the Code) or in other words whether

Kotina Appa Rao Vs. Kotina Sriramulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 26, Rules 1 and 4

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD631

various circumstances appointed Commissioner from State itself - held, no illegality committed while appointing Commissioner from State. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Junior Civil Judge, Srungavarapukota filed LA. No. 38 of 2003 in O.S. No. 114 of 1999 under Order 26, Rules 1 and 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, hereinafter referred as 'the Code', to direct the

Viraj Constructions Vs. P. Pandu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Courts Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 11(1) and 26

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD563; 1998(6)ALT262

not ascertain amount of relief - matter remanded back to Lower Court to ascertain amount of relief. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in respect of Ac.3-27 guntas of land situated in Begumpet, Hyderabad. The plaintiff valued the relief claimed under Section 26(c) of the Andhra Pradcsh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'), at Rs.10,000/- and