Advanced Search Results

Man Singh and anr. Vs. Ghure and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All226

of Revenue of the 13th November 1875--Act No. XIX of 1873 (N.W.P. Land Revenue Act), Section 257. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

The Court of Wards on Behalf of the Raja of Kantit Vs. Gaya Prasad and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All107

of decree--Act VIII (108) of 1859, Civil Procedure Code, Sections 256, 257--Suit for recovery of purchase-money--Caveat emptor--Irregularity. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Muhammad HusaIn Khan Vs. Ram Sarup and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All9

(Limitation Act), Schedule ii, No. 179 (4)--' Step in aid of execution'--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 257, 258. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Shiam Lal Vs. Chhaki Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All220

land within his circle by a patwari--Act No. XIX of 1873 (N.W.P. Land Revenue Act), Section 257. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Kadir Baksh and anr. Vs. Ghazi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All212

257, Act VIII of 1859. Extension of decree - Irregularity--Sale in execution--Act VIII of 1859, Section 257. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Daryai Vs. Sukhai

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All374

1859, Sections 256, 257 - Act XXIII of 1861, Sections 11, 35--Auction-sale--Order cancelling sale--Appeal--Suit to set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Ankit Packaging Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner (Ct) (Legal)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 30 and 39; Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 21 and 21(2); Karnataka Sales Tax Act - Sections 22A; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 11, 11A, 11(2) and 20(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2006]148STC578(AP)

Matched in: Citation [2006]148STC578(AP)

Delhi Jal Board vs.vimal Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

refer, with advantage, in this connection, to a judgement of a Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board v Central Government Industrial Tribunal, 2006 (88) DRJ75(DB), authored by the learned Chief Justice Markandeya Katju, J.(as … to join the duty”.12. On 10th September, 1990, Office Order (O.O.) No 257 (Dist.) C.S.E. filed by the petitioner before the LC and exhibited, accordingly … of the WP (C) 11041/2004 Page 1 respondent to be violative of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”) and, consequently, directs reinstatement of the respondent with full back

People Union for Civil Liberties Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 3, 4(2), 5(2), 26, 28, 32, 33, 35(2), 37, 38, 90 and 91; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 134, 226 and 229; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections - 100 and 115 - Order XLI, Rule 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374 and 401; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India Act, 1935; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 59(2)

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC1; (2001)1UPLBEC3

formality - Chief Justice not required to give opportunity of being heard to parties before giving certificate. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of this proposition, he has placed reliance on Commissioner of Income-tax v. Dhadi Sahu, 1994 Suppl. (1) SCC 257, wherein it was held that the law which brings about change in the forum does not effect pending

M/S. Tci Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

DCR 58 applied to the Mukesh Mills property. 9. On 18th August 2006, the MOEF wrote to the State Government clarifying, inter alia, that- “the … Bank v Rajinder Lal Capoor, (2008) 5 SCC 257; Bombay Dyeing, supra.). 27. In Suresh Estates(Supra) the … allied developmental imbalances. This has been recognized by the Supreme Court itself (UsmanGani J. Khatri of Bombay v Cantonment Board and Ors., (1992) 3 SCC 455, para 23; State of West Bengal v Terra Firm Trading and … a sea change. Town and Country Planning in Maharashtra is governed by the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (“the MRTP Act”). That Act requires, inter alia, the designated planning authority - in this case, the … Regulation Zone Notification 1991 (“the 1991 CRZ Notification”) under the provisions of Sections 3(1) and 3(2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (“the EP Act”)