Advanced Search Results

Ram Dial and ors. Vs. Ram Das and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All181

VIII of 1859, Section 254 - Sale in execution--Defaulting purchaser--Appeal--High Court--Appellate Civil Jurisdiction--Division Court--Letters Patent, Clause 10. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Mst. Govindi Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 1 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31(2), 31(4), 68, 246, 254(2), 382 and 389

Reported in : AIR1952All88

compensation in form of Bonds - Act not invalid on ground that no compensation is provided for. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the consideration of the President and it received his assent and, as such, under the provisions of Article 254(2) the Act is valid and so far as the State of Uttar Pradesh is concerned, the provisions of

Saraf Infra Projects Ltd. and Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal and Or ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

the writ petitioners have not challenged the Constitutional validity of the Works of Defence Act, 1903 or the Cantonment Act, 2006 as unreasonable or interfering with their right to property’. Learned Counsel submitted that there is no … writ petitioners have not challenged the Constitutional validity of the Works of Defence Act, 1903 or the Cantonment Act, 2006 as unreasonable or interfering with their right to property’. Learned Counsel submitted that there is no question of … enumerated in the State List.”. (9) Learned Counsel also referred to Art. 254 of the Constitution of India which provides as follows:“Art.254. Inconsistency between laws … Single Judge by filing WP No.704 of 2012 seeking a declaration that Sections 628 and 629 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 (In short

The Mirzapur Electric Supply Company Limited Vs. the State of Uttar Pr ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 254 and 254(2); Uttar Pradesh Electric (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1972; Uttar Pradesh Electric (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 38 and 47A; Uttar Pradesh Government Electrical Undertakings (Dues Recovery) Act, 1958

Reported in : AIR1975All29

paid to board does not come under arrears - notice issued to recover security is not valid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … provisions of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, and is, therefore, void on account of the provisions of Article 254 of the Constitution. Electricity is a concurrent subject, being included in Entry 38 of List III of the

Tungal Ram Vs. Smt. Leelawati

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 254(1) and 254(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 6, Rule 17; Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Amendment) Act, 1973; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 97(1)

Reported in : AIR1978All46

Act of 1973 became ineffective - District Judge no more empowered to exercise power under Section 115. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the State amendment, they are cognizable by the High Court in view of the Central amendment. Article 254 of the Constitution provides :--'254. Inconsistency between laws made by Parliament and laws made by the Legislatures of

Farooqi (M.S.) Vs. Anti-corruption Commission (by Chairman and Members ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1969)IILLJ78J& K

servant can be held only at the instance of the Government), and also unlike the Prevention of Corruption Act 2006 (under which no Court can take cognizance of an offence of bribery punishable under Sections 161 to 165 … Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the ' Union List'. 254. (1) If any provision of a law made by the legislature of … Mal v. Nathu Mal it has been held as follows:A law pertaining to the control of rents In cantonment areas falls within the ambit of entry 3 of List I of Schedule VII under the Constitution. The … on their behalf. Preliminary objections are taken that the Commission constituted under Section 5 of the Jammu and Kashmir Prevention of Corruption Act, 1962, exercises

Cantonment Board of Deolali Vs. Mrs. Usha Devidas Dongre and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 254(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3(1); Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 2(20), 9(2) and 9(3)

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR281

cantonments are constituted by the Central Government in accordance with the powers conferred under section 3(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924. The Central Government is authorised to declare any place or places in which any part of the … not remediless and that would further buttress the above view. [Jagannath Singh v Dr. Ajay Upadyay & anr 2006 Cri LJ 4274; 2006 (5) AIR Bom R held per incuriam]. - III of 1978 to regulate recruitment … contention urged by the learned Counsel in view of provisions of Article 254 of the Constitution. Article 254 reads as under :254. 'Inconsistency between laws

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … Indian Succession Act, 1925 is a Central Legislation. In terms of Article 254 of the Constitution of India, if any provision of a law made … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v. … By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act,

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … Indian Succession Act, 1925 is a Central Legislation. In terms of Article 254 of the Constitution of India, if any provision of a law made … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v. … By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act,

Collector of Chengalpattu Vs. S.P.Balakrishnan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

No.254/1 and the same is marked as Ex.B.1 as per which, the suit property is classified as the Cantonment poramboke. However, the original 'A' register shows the suit lands as Chatharam poramboke. It is admitted that the … regard to the validity and genuineness of the above document, as per Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, the above documents can easily be presumed to be true and genuine and as such, it can be