Advanced Search Results

Panna Lal Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5, 7 and 7(1); ;Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains Dealers Licensing Order, 1964; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173, 190, 251, 251A, 252 and 537

Reported in : AIR1969All123; 1969CriLJ354

ambit of Sections 251, 251-A and 252 and proceedings before Magistrate would not be under Section 251-A. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd., Hargaon Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 49, 245 and 246; Uttar Pradesh Large Land Holdings Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 11 and 12; Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 251 and 267

Reported in : AIR1960All136

taxation progressive in nature - progressive rate has valid justification - held, Act not discriminatory in nature. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the tax to be levied by the impugned Act is nothing but land revenue and inasmuch as Ss. 251 and 267 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act provided that the land revenue of

K.M. Subramani Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 279 and 318

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)44; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)350; 2003CriLJ3526

counsel for the revision petitioner-accused regarding appreciation of evidence etc.10. The Criminal Revision Case is, accordingly, ordered. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … I have perused the entire record of this case. The papers relating to the examination of accused under Section 251, Cr. P.C. as well under Section 313, Cr. P.C. contain the signature of the revision petitioner-accused in Tamil.

People's Movement for Civic Action through Its General Secretary, Patr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

the VP that the construction was not made by respondent No.6 until 2006 or even later. Hence the initial sanction/approval/permission/licence of 31st May, 1995 has … cases of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Nandlal Jaiswal AIR 1987 SC 251; Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action Vs. Union of India 1996 (5) … upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay Vs. Cantonment Board and Ors., Pune being SLP No. 647 of 1992 Jt 1992(4) SC 538 with other matters in … the Town and Country Planning Department, respondent No.4, (TP) under Section 44 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (TP Act) and the Village Panchayat Curea, Bambolim and Talaolim, Tiswadi, Goa, respondent No.2, (VP) under Regulation

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the accused persons Under Section 251. Since the accused persons declined to plead guilty the Court fixed the case for production of witnesses and

In Re: Teck-men Tools (P.) Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251 and 391 to 396; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 80 to 83

Reported in : [2009]150CompCas800(AP); [2009]92SCL59(AP)

fixed at Rs. 2,000, (Rupees two thousand only), to be paid to him by the Central Government. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the Company or pendency of any investigation proceedings in relation to the Company under Sections 235 - 251 and the like before sanctioning any compromise or arrangement. Under Sub-section (3), an order made by the Court

In Re: Spectrum Power Generation Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 169, 190, 217, 235 to 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 393, 393(1) and 394; Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI); Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153, 153(1) and 153(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 79

Reported in : [2008]146CompCas266(AP)

2007 and the C.A. SR. No. 3351 of 2007 for imposing sanctions on the expenditure are dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the company, the pendency of any investigating proceedings in relation to the company under Sections 235 - 251 and the like. If the procedure of holding the meeting, of the creditors or members, as the case

In Re: Spartek Ceramics India Ltd. Rep. by Its Group Deputy General Ma ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 117C, 235 to 251, 391, 391(2), 392, 393, 394 and 643; Sick Industrial Companies. (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Parliamentary Act; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 79

Reported in : 2006(1)ALT589; [2007]7SCL548(AP)

Matched in: Citation 2006(1)ALT589; [2007]7SCL548(AP)

Devender Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Thru. Secy. Min. of Defence and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

in brief.4. The Cantonment Board, Meerut is category -I Cantonment and is governed by the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 2006. Section 12 of the said Act provides the constitution of a Cantonment Board. It further provides that in Category … writ, order or direction prohibiting the respondents from taking any action on the basis of the resolution No. 251 dt. 20.9.2007.iii) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the resolution No. 251 dt.20.9.2007 as well as

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

Matched in: Advocate F.S.Nariman, Adv. and ;Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Adv., i/b., ;Mahimtura and Co. in Writ Petition No. 1957, 2196, 2937 of 2006, ;J.J.Bhatt, Sr. Adv., ;Anjali Chandurkar, Adv., i/b., ;Kanga and Co. in Writ Petit Ravi Kadam, Adv. General and K.R. Belosey, G.P. K.K. Singhavi, Sr. Adv. with Priti Purandare, Adv. for respondent Municipal Corporation.in Writ Petition Nos. 1957 2937, 2093, 2111, 2930, 2985, 2752, 2