Advanced Search Results

Koppu Satyanarayana Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 122, 250 and 340; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 179 and 181; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD443

and hence the objection taken is a tenable objection. The learned Counsel also pointed out to Sections 122, 250 and 340 of the Cantonment Act 2006, in short referred to as 'Act' for the purpose of convenience.4. … period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Ram Kishan (deceased) Through Legal Representatives Vs. Manish Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

available to be challenged.12. Issue No.2 that was deleted was whether the provisions of Section 250 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the Act’) would bar the suit filed by the first respondent/the plaintiff. Obviously, after

Velaga Satya Venkata Seetaramam Vs. Kuntaam Narayanamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 250, 250(1) and 250(2) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 424 and 427

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)857; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)518

(1) and 250 (2) - held, Order passed by Magistrate did not suffer from any legal infirmity. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Ram Singh Vs. Mathura and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)ILR34All354; 14Ind.Cas.599

application of - Frivolous and vexatious accusations--Compensation to lie awarded along with order of discharge or acquittal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that the learned Magistrate in his judgment says:--'The case is utterly false and I acquit all the accused.' Section 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not intended to meet the case of false accusations. It was

Damodar Das Vs. Gokal Chand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All79

Practice - Civil Procedure Code, Section 53--Rejection, etc., of plaint at a date subsequent to first hearing. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the later date, give security for the costs of the respondent,'and do certain other acts mentioned in the section. 250. The tidings are undoubtedly strong authorities that the limitation as to time within which a party to the

M/s Chalet Hotels Limited Vs. M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Aviation, Government of India, in exercise of powers conferred under the provisions of Section 9A of the Aircraft Act, 1934, to regulate construction for the safety of aircraft operations. Prior to the said notification, similar notification relating

M.A. Jaleel Vs. Prakash Road Lines Ltd. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 337; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 476 and 476(7)

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD60

Accordingly, to the extent referred to supra, the appeal is partly allowed. No order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

W. Veerabhadra Rao Vs. Nedungudi Bank Limited and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 84 and 85

Reported in : 1998(6)ALT216

is ordered and the lower Court is directed to refund the said amounts to the auction purchaser. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Jindal Strips Limited and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Reported in : (2008)12VST149(P& H)

in pursuance of order of the honourable Supreme Court dated July 14, 2006 in C. A. No. 3453 of 2002 and connected matters reported in … No. 2650 of 2005 See [2007] 9 VST 250 (Gauhati), considered the issue in a batch of … mean the areas within the limits of a (i) Municipal Corporation, (ii) Municipality, (iii) Notified area committee, (iv) Cantonment board, (v) Town board, (vi) Mines board, (vii) Municipal board, (viii) Gram panchayat and (ix) any other local … issue arose in the context of challenge to the constitutional validity of the Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act') on the anvil of Article 301 of the Constitution/Contention raised on … supply and sanitation were meant to facilitate freeflow of trade and since Section 22 of the Act provided for distribution of tax collected among local

State Government Pensioners Association Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Pension and Gratuity Rules - Rule 9

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD338

drawn - held, illegal as Government liable to fix benefits on basis agreed between Government and employees. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.