Advanced Search Results

Khaja Kutubuddin Khan S/O Late Khaja Moi Vs. The Secunderabad Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

said premises without notice and without following due process of law, contrary to the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (referred to as new Act) and in violation of Article 300- A of the constitution of India. Petitioners … late Khaja Moinuddin Khan R/o 699, Khaja Mansion, Road No.36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad and another Petitioners The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Court compound, S P Road, SEcunderabad Rep by its Chief Executive Officer and others . Respondents Counsel … was established and was functioning for long time. On 6.4.2001 notice under Section 185 of Cantonment Act 1924 (referred to as Old Act) was issued … before the Appellate Authority on 12.7.2001 and Appellate Authority granted stay. On 25.11.2013 the entire structures were demolished. Challenging the said demolition this writ petition

Smt. Naseem Sultana Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board Rep by Its

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

pleaded by the petitioners, the powers and duties of respondent No.2 are enumerated under Section 25 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act'). The learned Standing Counsel for the Secunderabad Cantonment Board has not disputed that the

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

2(20) of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined … by respondent No. 3 by filing Appeal No. 20 of 2005 before the School Tribunal at Solapur, under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 (for short, ''MEPS Act').

G. Pandari Babu Vs. Chairman, Coir Board and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD486

as decided in precedent is industry - held, Section 25-F applicable and order of termination set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Uni Metal Alloys Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. Apseb, Hyderabad and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 78-A

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD558

after expiry of 3 years - held, respondent cannot withdraw it during initial period of 3 years. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ORDER1. In this writ petition the petitioner assails the action of the respondents in withdrawing the 25% power rebate allowed to the petitioner from 15-10-1987 to January, 1988 and debiting the total sum of Rs.6,65,875.97

Talla Palli Kasi Visalakshmi Vs. Tallapalli Venkata Vijayalakshmi and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300

Reported in : AIR2004AP160; 2004(1)ALD569

within meaning of murder - held, Section 25 does not bar respondents to inherit properties of deceased. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Andhra Pradesh Power Diploma Engineers Association and ors. Vs. Superi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1971 - Rule 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD371; [2002(95)FLR1064]; (2003)ILLJ229AP

be settled by Commissioner of Labour - High Court not to interfere with matter under writ jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … direction to the Management of the Board to discharge obligation caste on it under Clause (v) of Rule 25 of the A.P. Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1971 (for short 'the Rules') and reserving liberty to

T. Purushotham Reddy Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975 - Rules 21(1), 23 and 26(3); General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 16(1); Punjab Civil Services Rules - Rule 5.32(B); Indian Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD607; 2003(1)ALT379

petitioner ceased to be in employment from 24.09.1999 so departmental enquiry and orders passed against him illegal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … as Administrative Manager and Assistant Manager he was promoted in September, 1997 as Divisional Manager. By letter dated 25.8.1999, the petitioner communicated the intent to resign from service with effect from 24.9.1999 with a request that the

A. Ravinder Singh and ors. Vs. Chief Commr. of Cce

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2005(124)LC271(AP)

order passed in review--Tribunal has no power to make suggestion in review--Order passed by Tribunal not sustainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the promotions from various in-service cadres on the ministerial line was fixed under the Rules at 75% : 25%. However, the Rules did not provide modalities for preparation of the seniority list inter se D.R.Is. and P.R.Is

P. Ramachandraiah Chetty Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Boar ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 37

Reported in : AIR2003AP338

three years from date of right to sue accrued and liable to dismissed on ground of limitation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … mistakenly without deducting the amount, due towards erection and dismantling charges etc., later by Ex, A-16 communication dated 25-10-1976 respondent informed the appellant that he need pay only Rs. 5,892/- but not Rs. 9,275/- towards erection and