Advanced Search Results

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

276/4, 11/4, and 20respectively. The complaints Crl. L.P. 70/2015 Etc. Page 4 of 10 had alleged offences under Section 247 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 having been committed by the respective respondents by carrying out certain construction work … Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … erect a building on any land in a Cantonment without the previous sanction of the Board. According to Section 247 illegal erection of a building is an offence, punishable with a fine which may extend to fifty thousand

Rajbir Singh vs.commissioner of Police & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

No.2 for unauthorised construction and notice against the respondent No.2 was framed under Section 247 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 wherein he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to fine to the tune of ₹10,000/- and cost towards demolition … FIR was registered as a counterblast to the action taken by the petitioner of issuing notice to the Cantonment Board on 26th October, 2015 asking them to take action against the unauthorized construction done by respondent No.2

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 … and till obtaining the said Certificate, building shall not be occupied for habitation since such Certificate is issued; Section 247 contemplates illegal erection and re-erection without having a valid notice as required by Sections 235 and 236. Section

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … in any case in which the Board considers that such erection or re- erection is an offence under section 247 and may, in any such case or in any other case in which the Board considers that the

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … in any case in which the Board considers that such erection or re- erection is an offence under section 247 and may, in any such case or in any other case in which the Board considers that the

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … in any case in which the Board considers that such erection or re- erection is an offence under section 247 and may, in any such case or in any other case in which the Board considers that the

State of U.P. Vs. Lal Bahadur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Public Gambling Act, 1867 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1) and 247

Reported in : AIR1968All55; 1968CriLJ223

- acquit the accused -magistrate has discretion to adjourn the hearing- there should be a proper reason. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to appear in the case and they prayed that they be acquitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 247, Code of Criminal Procedure, The case was adjourned to 17-5-1965 for arguments. Nobody was present on behalf of

Janki Vs. the Collector of Allahabad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All64

recovery of, by Government--Execution of decree--Cross-decrees--Cross-claims under same decree--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 244 (c), 246, 247, 411. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

MatadIn and ors. Vs. Chandi DIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All188

course of this judgment.Brodhurst, J.7. I concur. Execution of decree - Civil Procedure Code, Sections 246, 247--Cross-decrees--Setoff--Limitation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.