Advanced Search Results

Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Section 57; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

provision of Cantonments Act, 2006 and the building byelaws (copy of CBR is enclosed).Moreover, it is submitted that Section 244 (1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 which deals with the subject of change of use of any land … order dated 20th February 2009 whereby in exercise of its power to review under Section 57 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 („CA 2006) the Government of India („GOI) in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) (Respondent No.1) set aside a

Jagdish Rai and Another Vs. Cantonment Board and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

3.8.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2 whereby a fine of ` 1,00,000/- under Section 244(2) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 had been imposed upon them for alteration by making erection/re-erection of the building viz. marriage palace which amounted

Bhagwati Vs. Banwari Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All82

not given--Remedies open to decree-holder auction-purchaser--Act No. XV of 1877 (Indian Limitation Act), Schedule II, Article 138. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the sale. Both the lower courts have held that the suit Is barred by the provisions of Section 244 of the Code of Civil Procedure.2. In consequence of the conflict of authority in this Court on the

Sheo NaraIn Vs. Chunni Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All243

to the suit--Second mortgagee taking a mortgage during the pendency of a suit on the first mortgage. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Rs. 29,000 odd was still due to them under their decree, and that the claim was barred by Section 244 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The issues framed by the Court below as between the plaintiff and

J.G. Harman and Co. Vs. Shankar Dat Dube

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All245

January 1895. Civil Procedure Code, Sections 234, 244, 278, 283 - Execution of decree--Representative of deceased judgment-debtor--Practice--Appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

GhazidIn Vs. Fakir Bakhsh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All73

of execution a matter 'relating to execution' of decree--Order appealable--Order restoring judgment-debtor to possession after execution--Order illegal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Code, and not being orders in execution, but in stay of execution of the decree, were not within Section 244, and not being specially appealable under Section 588 are not appealable at all. And it is further urged

Lachman Ram and anr. Vs. Mathura Das

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All239

on the ground of fraud of a sale held in execution of a decree--Proper remedy by application. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Judge, in a carefully-considered judgment, held that the suit was not maintainable, having regard to the provisions of Section 244 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and he accordingly dismissed the suit. He also on an application made

Jaikaran Bharti Vs. Raghunath Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1900)ILR20All254

tale on the ground of an adjustment of the decree out of Court-Adjustment not certified--Suit not maintainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … In appeal in a suit to set aside the sale, the Committee of the Privy Council held that Section 244 of the Code of Civil Procedure barred the plaintiff's suit, inasmuch as the question which had arisen was

Nand Kishore Vs. Lalji Mal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1897)ILR19All332

Section 244--Representative of a party to the suit--Purchaser of property under attachment in execution of a decree. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Sabhajit Vs. Gopal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All222

auction-purchaser to be restored to possession--Representative of party to suit--Auction purchaser, who is also assignee of decree. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that this application does not lie, it being contended that the order in question was one made under Section 244 of Act No. XIV of 1882, Another contention in support of the objection was that, if the order