Advanced Search Results

Yar Muhammad and anr. Vs. Lakshmi Das and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 180, 183 and 242; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 and 20

Reported in : AIR1959All1

no Court can refuse to entertain suit under Section 9 on pretext of discouraging multiplicity of litigation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … been constituted to consider the question 'Whether the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred by virtue of Section 242 of the U. P. Tenancy Act in respect of suit filed under Section 9 of the Specific Relief

Jag-naraIn Mallah Vs. Bhagauti Prasad Pandey

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 180, 183 and 242; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 40, 40(2) and 40(3)

Reported in : AIR1958All48

Order his name entered in the khasra - cannot be termed as an Order as to possession. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the defendants-applicants that the jurisdiction of the civil Courts to hear them was barred by the provisions of Section 242 of the U. P. Tenancy Act. Both the suits purported to be suits purely and simply under Section

Queen-empress Vs. Ghulet and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All44

- Alternative charges--Act XLV of 1860 (Penal Code), Section 193--False evidence--Contradictory statements--Assignment of false statement not necessary. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … more heads charging respectively each of such offences accordingly.' And effect was further given to the terms of Section 242 by the terms of Sections 381 and 382 of the Code. What happened in Bombay in the matter

Mahender Man Singh Vs. Badri and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1939All433

We allow to the appellant the costs of the hearing before the Full Bench in both cases. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a reference to a Full Bench in the following terms:Does an appeal lie to the District Judge under Section 242(1)(d), Agra Tenancy Act (3 of 1926), against the decision of the Revenue Court in a suit for recovery

City Automobiles and anr. Vs. J.K. Industries Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 219 and 220(2)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)123; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)9

circumstances - no yardstick is provided for uniform application - held, filling of ten complaint is legal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 739 F.B., it has been held thus : 'The word 'charge' is not defined in the Code. In Section 242 the word 'accused' is used in connection with the particulars of the offence being stated to the accused

T. Laxmi Narasamma W/O. Sathaiah Vs. Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Deputy ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Andhra Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1961 - Sections 10; Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959 - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD410; 2008(4)ALT163

the amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- paid in excess to her.Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … trees and irrigation well does not arise more so because her land was purchased as per G.O.Ms. No. 242, SW (F) Department dated 4.12.1991. As the Assistant Director (Horticulture), Adilabad and Executive Engineer (Tribal Welfare, Utnoor, inspected

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … Supreme Court also reaffirmed its previous holding in Boswell v. Bethea , 242 Ala. 292, 296-297, 5 So. 2d 816, 820-821 (1942), that the decisions … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

Sarita Tiwari vs M/S Deccan Charters Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

rendered by learned Single Judges of thisCourt. To the contrary, a Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board v. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Ors. [2006 (88) DRJ 75 (DB)], has given a clear finding … 223 and Raj Kumar Rastogi v P.O. Labour Court-X, (2015) 221 DLT 242, and therefore, such finding does not call for reversal by this Court … and order has,however, directed that the amount paid to the appellant under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) shall not be recovered.4. At this juncture, we may note that

M/s. Masterstroke Freight Forwarders Pvt Limited Vs. The Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

In 1997 2 CTC 507 (MSD Thenraja Vs. Executive Officer), it has been held as follows:- 24. The Cantonments Electoral Rules, 1945 Chapter VII, Rule 42 contemplates election petition and Rule 47 contemplates grounds for declaring election … 23. This court, by judgement dated 17.07.2012 made in TC(A)No. 159 of 2006, has held as under:- 3. Learned counsel for the assessee placed before … Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Imports) chennai), 2009 242 ELT 487 Madras (NLC Ltd Vs. Union of … The Petitioner was granted a licence to operate as a customs broker after satisfying all the norms. Whileso, action has been initiated by the Mumbai Commissionerate, against the petitioner with regard to 10 Bills of Entry, through … The petitioner is a customs House Agent with a license granted under section 146 of the customs Act and is the holder of CHA Regular

Council for Advancement of Peoples Action and Rura Vs. Shri Ramesh Cha ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

In this regard, he has placed reliance on the decision of Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Others, 2006 (88) DRJ 7.(DB), wherein the Division Bench has observed:4. … Date of Decision:24. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 894/2007 and C.M. Nos. 1543/2007, 3985/2010 & 3986/2010 COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLES ACTION & RURAL TECHNOLOGY (CAPART) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Prashant Singh, Ms.Prateti … in lieu of notice period has not been made in terms of Section 12(1) of the Service Bye-Laws quoted above, simultaneously at the time of … in Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. T. Mohammed Raisuli Hassan, 1982 FJR 242.The Supreme Court held that there was nothing to indicate or suggest, even