Advanced Search Results

Gulab Singh and ors. Vs. Ram Dial and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All26

the revenue authorities. Act XIX of 1873, Section 241, Clause (i) - Revenue--Pattidar--Suit for Contribution--Jurisdiction--Civil Court--Revenue Court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Mohammad Matteen Qidwai Vs. the Governor-general in Council

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 240, 240(1), 240(2), 241(2) and 277(1); Constitution of India - Articles 310 and 311

Reported in : AIR1953All17

pay by action against the Crown - proper remedy is to make a representation to the Government. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … no application to that of removal. It is, therefore, contended that the case falls under the proviso to Section 241(2), Government of India Act. It is further emphasised that Rule 729, State Establishment Code-enables an employee to be

Sundar and ors. Vs. Khuman Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All613

Civil and Revenue Court--Act XIX of 1873 (North-Western Provinves Land Revenue Act), Sections 62, 91, 94, 241. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Ram Ugrah Singh and ors. Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Counc ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All140

of revenue - Jurisdiction of Civil Court--Declaratory decree--Act XIX of 1873 (N.W.P. Land Revenue Act), Section 241. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Krishnan v. Krishnaveni reported in (1997) 4 SCC 241 : 1997 Cri LJ 1519. The relevant observations of the Apex Court are as follows:The object of Section

Emperor Vs. Mangal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1914)ILR36All13

- Right of accused to summon witnesses--Second application by accused to magistrate not seised of the case--Procedure--Affidavit. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … warning. The contents of this warning will be duly and carefully explained to him. Criminal Procedure Code, Sections 241 and 540 - Right of accused to summon witnesses--Second application by accused to magistrate not seised of the

Muhammad Shadi Khan and ors. Vs. Muhammad Abdul Karim

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All429

(N.-W. P. Land Revenue Act) Sections 111, 112, 113, 131, 132, 241 (f)--Civil Procedure Code, Section 11. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Jagan Nath Vs. Tirbeni Sahai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All41

- Act (Local) No. III of 1901, (United Provinces Land Revenue Act), Section 223(k)--Partition--Civil and Revenue Courts--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and dismiss the appeal with costs. Act No. XIX of 1873, (N.W.P. Land Revenue Act), Sections 132 and 241 - Act (Local) No. III of 1901, (United Provinces Land Revenue Act), Section 223(k)--Partition--Civil and Revenue Courts--Jurisdiction. -

Automotive Manufacturers Limited Vs. Member, Industrial Court and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Industrial Employment (Standing Order) Act, 1946 - Sections 5, 10A, 10A(1) and 10A(3); Industrial Employment (Standing Order) (Amendment) Act, 1982; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders Amendment) Rules, 1977; Standing Order Rules, 1959

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR429; (2009)IVLLJ153Bom

can certainly initiate the disciplinary enquiry inspite of acquittal. In (Suresh Pathrella v. Oriental Bank of Commerce) : 2006 DGLS (soft) 727 : A.I.R. 2007 S.C. 199, Their Lordships of Supreme Court observed in para No. 11 … {Air India Ltd. v. L.R. Solanki and Anr.) : 2005 (5) Bom.C.R. 241 (O.S.) : 2005(3) Mh.LJ. 974, the learned Single of this Court had … he was responsible for death of the two employees of the company in the said accident and this act of the employee was subversive of the discipline in the premises of the factory. According to him, if … subsistence allowance till enquiry is completed.23. However, it appears that in 1982 Section 10-A was added to the Industrial Employment (Standing Order) Act, 1946 by