Advanced Search Results

Mohammad Matteen Qidwai Vs. the Governor-general in Council

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 240, 240(1), 240(2), 241(2) and 277(1); Constitution of India - Articles 310 and 311

Reported in : AIR1953All17

pay by action against the Crown - proper remedy is to make a representation to the Government. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … behalf of and under the authority of the Government of India (Railway Board). The defendant's case is that Section 240(2) applies to a case of dismissal and has no application to that of removal. It is, therefore, contended

Maqbool Raza Ghaffar HussaIn Vs. Joint Director of Consolidation, U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 240D, 240G and 240J; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1954

Reported in : AIR1969All26

sealed and signed under Section 240-J neither create a bar of res judicata nor that of conclusiveness. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Ramireddy S. and ors. Vs. A.P. Foods and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2001(1)ALT356; (2001)ILLJ1247AP

absence of material facts matter remitted back to Managing Director with a direction to pass speaking order. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … preferred there against and the appellate Court, inter alia, held that as the appellants have completed more than 240 days of work, their services were liable to be regularised but it was observed that they may take

Deputy Executive Engineer, I and P, Rc Department and anr. Vs. Padamat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ396AP

and termination of respondent services was not in breach of mandatory provision of Section 25F of Act. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … S.R. Nayak, J. 1. The 1st respondent workman, complaining that though he had put in 240 days of continuous service in the establishment of the appellants herein, his services were terminated abruptly with effect

Chandra Bhan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Civil Services (C.C.A.) Rules, 1930 - Rule 55; Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 - Rule 7

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC739; (2003)1UPLBEC749

- dismissal is major punishment - should be passed only after complying with principle of natural justice. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to above, was bodily lifted out of the rules and together with an additional opportunity embodied in Section 240(3) of the Government of India Act, 1935, so as to give a statutory protection to the Government servants

Radha vs.food and Civil Supplies Department

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

was contended on behalf of the petitioner, whilst placing reliance on the verdict of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal and Ors. 129 (2006) DLT610 that as held therein the principle of … 1947 in as much as the petitioner had admittedly put in over 240 days of service and the conditions of Section 25F of the Industrial … that the respondent fell within the ambit of „Industry‟ in terms of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and implicitly thus held that the termination of services of the petitioner on 31.12.2009 by the respondent

Seth Gobind Dass Vs. Major-general Showers

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All400

of 1873, Section 3, Clause 1--Irregularity in publication of Court sale of Court sale of Khalisa Mahal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and set aside the order of the Judge, and set aside the sale. Act VIII of 1859, Sections 240, 248 - Act XIX of 1873, Section 3, Clause 1--Irregularity in publication of Court sale of Court sale

Secunderabad Cantonment Board.... Vs. Narinder Kumar Dhingra and Othe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Cantonment Board had issued a notice dated 19.01.2011 to the respondents/writ petitioners under Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short the Act) directing respondents to stop erection/re-erection of the building and remove unauthorized structures shown in … of any building if such erection or re-erection is not in conformity with any general scheme sanctioned under section 240. (3) The Board, before sanctioning the erection or re-erection of a building on land which is under the

itc Limited Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A(2), 10, 25B, 25B(2) and 25F; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1964; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD553; 2006(2)ALT50

Matched in: Citation 2006(1)ALD553; 2006(2)ALT50

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Iv an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC806

engineer who had no power to make appointments - held, finding of Labour Court quashed as perverse. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … attendance register, pay register or any other register maintained in ordinary course of business. The burden of proving 240 days' continuous working lies on workman. He examined himself. In his statement he has stated that he never