Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 238 · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 09 2017

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … is deemed to have been sanctioned; or (b) without complying with any direction made under sub-section (1) of section 238, or (c) when sanction has been refused, or has ceased to be available or has been suspended by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2013

Joshua Khan Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Theatre Road, Cantt. Jabalpur. It was resolved to refuse the sanction of the Board to proposed erection/re­erection under section 238 of the Cantts Act, 2006 due to the following reasons:­ 1. The land on which the building plan … 33 dated 07­08­2007. Your Building Plan and Application u/s­179 (Revised u/s­235 of Cantonment Act, 2006) was put­up in the Cantonment Board meeting and the following … Khan Part of Sy. No.113,B.No.5, Plot No.4/1, Theater Road, Jabalpur Cantt. Sub:­ BUILDING PLAN APPLICATION u/s­235 of Cantts. Act, 2006 Ref:­ Your application dated 04­11­2006 & vide CBR No. 33 dated 07­08­2007. Your Building Plan and Application u/s­179

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 1952

Dharam Sarup Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-08-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 238

Reported in : AIR1953All37

- discretion of the sanctioning authority is absolute and cannot be questioned in a Court of Law. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of by the prosecution for the prosecution of the appellant under Section 5 (2) of the Act.16. Under Section 238, Criminal P. C. :'When a person is charged with an offence consisting of several particulars, a combination of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 17 2014

Rohit Gera Vs. Pune Cantonment Board Golibar Maidan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

dated 21st May, 2009 issued by respondent No.1 Pune Cantonment Board issued under Section 248 (1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act” for short), order dated 30th November, 2013 passed in Appeal preferred … the Board on 2nd August, 2007. On 6th May,2008 the Board accorded sanction to the building plans under Section 238 of the said Act. The petitioner thereafter commenced the work of construction. During the course of inspection on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1957

Shyam Lal Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-26-1957

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4 and 199; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498

Reported in : AIR1958All76; 1958CriLJ11

- facts mentioned must disclose the offence under Section 498 - otherwise no cognizance to be made. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … on the evidence, of the offence under Section 498 and in doing So he purported to act under Section 238, Cr. P. C. The case was started on the complaint of the husband of the woman and it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-09-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 … is deemed to have been sanctioned; or (b) without complying with any direction made under sub-section (1) of Section 238; or (c) when sanction has been refused, or has ceased to be available or has been suspended by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2014

Secunderabad Cantonment Board.... Vs. Narinder Kumar Dhingra and Othe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-14-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Cantonment Board had issued a notice dated 19.01.2011 to the respondents/writ petitioners under Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short the Act) directing respondents to stop erection/re-erection of the building and remove unauthorized structures shown in … appeal from an order, other than an order contained in a notice issued under section 144, section 183, section 238, section 273 or section 302, where the appellate authority so directs, all proceedings to enforce the order and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2013

S.L.Seth Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

be alleged against the respondent No.4. However, the respondent No.4 has contended that action was taken under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (herein after referred to as '2006 Act'). Similarly, the respondent No.5 by filing a separate return, has contended … the petitioners. However, analogous provisions are made under Section 234 of the 2006 Act. Under sub-section (4) of Section 238 of the 2006 Act, yet another ground has been added for refusal to grant sanction to erect or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2008

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-27-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia … declared the Act unconstitutional. Stokes v. Noonan , 534 So. 2d 237, 238-239 (1988). The Alabama Supreme Court’s decree cast grave doubt on the legitimacy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2017

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.the Station House Officer P S Delhi Cantt an ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-07-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

in not stopping unauthorized constructions getting raised in the territorial jurisdiction of 'the Board' as contemplated under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (in short ‘the subject Act’). W.P.(C) 517/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. It is the case of the … is being carried on without or contrary to the sanction, but has not been completed, referred to in section 238 or in contravention of any condition subject to which such sanction has been accorded or in contravention of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial