Advanced Search Results

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … under Section 248(1) is to be exercised by the Chief Executive Officer of the Board (by virtue of Section 237 of the Act) and it is not in dispute that in the present case also has been exercised

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … under Section 248(1) is to be exercised by the Chief Executive Officer of the Board (by virtue of Section 237 of the Act) and it is not in dispute that in the present case also has been exercised

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … under Section 248(1) is to be exercised by the Chief Executive Officer of the Board (by virtue of Section 237 of the Act) and it is not in dispute that in the present case also has been exercised

Shaik Lal Mohammed and anr. Vs. Correspondent, Asafia High School and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 - Sections 83 and 89

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD732

was wrong in going by G.O. No. 237 as a subsequent Order No. 259 had been passed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Chhanga Khan Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Passport Act, 1920 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 236 and 237; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1956All69; 1956CriLJ20

of prominence - accused will be prejudiced if not permitted to face and explain the definite accusation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Advocate that in the circumstances of this case I should act under the provisions of Sections 236 and 237, Criminal P. C., and convict the 'applicant under Section 5, Influx from Pakistan (Control) Act, 1949. In my,

Sudhir Kumar Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Orders 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1; U.P. Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 117, 237 and 239; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC30; (2001)1UPLBEC237

public auction or inviting tenders in proper way - appeal not sustainable as agreement done in collusion. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … any Rules framed for the purpose, it shall not be binding on the Zila Panchayat or Kshettra Samiti. Section 237 confers power on the State Government to make rules and Section 239 confers power on the Zila Parishad

Sanjeev Bhatiani Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

No.2/DCB on different dates in respect of the subject premises under Sections 340, 248 and 320 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), be quashed.3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the … which is in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. Counsel for the petitioner also states that Section 237 of the Act specifies the provisions under which the powers, duties and functions of the Board can be

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … court declared the Act unconstitutional. Stokes v. Noonan , 534 So. 2d 237, 238-239 (1988). The Alabama Supreme Court’s decree cast grave doubt on the … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

A.P. Civil Supplies Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Delta Oils and Facts Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E(5), 235, 235(2), 237, 297, 301 and 642(1)

Reported in : [2007]73SCL242(AP)

as to make necessary investigation as to its affairs.34. The Company Appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Cas. 41(AP) where a learned Single Judge of this Court while considering the scope of the enquiry under Section 237 of the Act held that it must deal only with the said power, which is expressly conferred on

T.G. Venkatesh Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 63, 68, 237, 628, 633, 633(1) and 633(2); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1897

Reported in : [2008]145CompCas662(AP); [2007]78SCL1(AP)

adduce necessary evidence before the Court, where prosecutions if launched against the petitioner, to prove his innocence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Director and the Chairman of the Company. It is stated by the petitioner that while conducting investigation under Section 237 of the Act, the Inspecting Officer has noticed the failure of the Company to comply with the schedule