Advanced Search Results

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … of any room in the building below the minimum prescribed by any bye-law made under this Act.” 5. Section 236 clarifies that a person required to give notice under Section 235 quoted above must specify the purpose for

Chhanga Khan Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Passport Act, 1920 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 236 and 237; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1956All69; 1956CriLJ20

of prominence - accused will be prejudiced if not permitted to face and explain the definite accusation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … on account of overstaying in India under Passport Act,1920, provided passport is valid - held , provision of Section 236 and 237 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 cannot be invoked to offences which fall within two different penal

Musammat Bhawani Kuar and ors. Vs. Gulab Rai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All348

1859, Sections 236, 252 - Decree charging land - Immoveable property--Sale of judgment-creditor's right in immoveable property. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 … Section 247 contemplates illegal erection and re-erection without having a valid notice as required by Sections 235 and 236. Section 248 contemplates power to demolish the building and Section 249 contemplates power to seal unauthorised construction. In

Sunkara Satyanarayana Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders - Orders 733 to 737 and 742; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32 and 226; Gaming Act - Sections 9(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD(Cri)117; 1999(6)ALT249; 2000CriLJ1297

this Court above. The petitioner will be entitled for costs which shall be set at Rs. 1,000/-. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … State of U.P., : 1963CriLJ329 a Seven-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Regulation 236 of the Police Regulations. The Hon'ble Supreme Court upheld Clause (a) and Clauses (c), (d) and (e) of

S. Bala Krishna Vs. The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

factual matrix is that the 2nd respondent by name V.Jai Prakash is member of the 8th ward of cantonment area. The petitioner/accused is present Defence Estates Officer, Kolkota Circle, Kolkota, West Bengal and earlier worked as Chief … Magistrate, Secunderabad, who took cognizance of protest petition filed by the defacto-complainant for the offences u/sec.3(1)(X) of SCs/STs(POA) Act, 1989. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner so also the learned Public Prosecutor representing State-1st respondent … 1. This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, the CrPC') by

Deoman Upadhyaya Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14 and 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 27, 161, 162 and 162(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : AIR1960All1; 1960CriLJ1

principles of Article 14 -Section 162 (2) as much it relates to Section 27 also becomes void. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 633: 50 LawEd 896, In Heath and Milligan Mfg. Co. v Worst(1907) 207 US 338: 52 Law Ed 236, Mckenna J.stated the law as follows at page 354 :--'Classification must have relation to the purpose of the

Sheo Nath Prasad Vs. Sarjoo Nonia and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilBanking

Reported in : AIR1943All220

on different grounds. I would therefore dismiss the appeal with costs.50. This appeal is dismissed with costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … since Sir Richard Garth enunciated the two following propositions in Sheikh Akbar v. Sheikh, Khan ('81) 7 Cal. 236:1. When a cause of action for money is once complete in itself, whether for goods sold, or for

Mangal Singh Vs. Harkesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 100 to 104 and 114; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 45

Reported in : AIR1958All42

single person - held, there is no question of apportioning the property between two or more persons. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … so as to make the acquisition ancestral property was considered in Purtab Bahadur v. Tilukdhario 1807-1 Select Rep. 236 (C), and the principles laid down were that 'of several brothers living together in family partnership should one

Ajai Kumar Vs. the Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1979All13

quasi-judicially while dealing with such cases - writ of Certiorari maintainable to quash Board's order canceling result. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Supreme Court have observed in Swarn Singh v. State of Punjab (AIR 1976 SC 232) that (at p. 236) :--'It is well settled that certiorari jurisdiction can be exercised only for correcting errors of jurisdiction committed by