Advanced Search Results

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … carrying out certain construction work at different plot of lands, such work statedly constituting breach of inhibition in Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006.2. It may be mentioned here that the complaints were presented through the Chief

Abdul Khader C M vs Cannanore Cantonment Board

Court : Kerala

in Bungalow area of Cannanore Cantonment. A notice for sanction as required under Section 235 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 was given by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent and the copy of the said notice is produced … NEAR N M UP SCHOOL, MATTOOL NORTH, KANNUR, PIN - 670325 BY ADV RAJESH NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS: 1 CANNANORE CANTONMENT BOARD OFFICE OF THE CANTONMENT BOARD CANNANORE, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, HQ HOSPITAL PO, KANNUR REPRESENTED

Rohit Gera Vs. Pune Cantonment Board Golibar Maidan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

dated 21st May, 2009 issued by respondent No.1 Pune Cantonment Board issued under Section 248 (1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act” for short), order dated 30th November, 2013 passed in Appeal preferred … making any material alteration in the building and hence there was no occasion to invoke the provision of Section 235 (2) (a) of the said Act. Relying upon the decision of the Allahabad High Court in the case

Official Liquidator Vs. Mathura Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 235; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 543; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1963All55

be held liable - active, non-active and new directors - not all are responsible for dishonest conduct. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ORDERA.P. Srivastava, J.1. This is an application under Section 235 of the Indian Companies Act of 1913.The Vijai Lakshmi Sugar Mills was a private limited company incorporated under

Vishwa Pal Sharma Vs. Sukh Sancharak Co. (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 175(2), 235 and 235(1)

Reported in : AIR1962All88; [1962]32CompCas947(All)

deceased director - held, the heirs cannot be held responsible for the liability of the deceased director. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … came to have full legal play.7. On the 17th December, 1954, the official Liquidator moved an application under Section 235 of the Companies Act 1913 against Vishwa Pal Sharma, Brijendra Pal Sharma and Shakti Pal Sharma's wife Smt.

Farzand Vs. Mohan Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225, 226, 233, 234, 235, 309 and 367; Uttar Pradesh Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Rules, 1951 - Rules 9, 21 and 32(2); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1968All67; (1970)ILLJ241All

rules - appointment made without consultation - held, appointment without consultation is not illegal - petition dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the District Judge are to be made by the Governor after consultation with the High Court. Under Article 235 control over district courts including the posting, promotion of and grant of leave to all persons holding any

Gopi Vs. Kassa Mal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All389

judgment-debtor--Appeal from order staying execution--Civil Procedure Code, Section 243--'Such Court'--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 235 (d), 381, 583. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Raja Ram Jaiswal Vs. Ganesh Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 43, 182, 219, 230 and 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 252; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91

Reported in : AIR1959All29

Contract, drafting ability of parties, intention sought to be conveyed and act of parties under the contract. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … his authority. That being the case the suit of the plaintiff was clearly barred by Sections 230 and 235 of the Indian Contract Act.5. Sections 230 and 235 Indian Contract Act could apply only if the appellant

In Re: Spectrum Power Generation Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 169, 190, 217, 235 to 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 393, 393(1) and 394; Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI); Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153, 153(1) and 153(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 79

Reported in : [2008]146CompCas266(AP)

2007 and the C.A. SR. No. 3351 of 2007 for imposing sanctions on the expenditure are dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033. The authorized share capital of the company, as on March 31, 2006, is Rs. 235,00,00,000 divided into 23,50,00,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each. The issued, subscribed and paid up share capital of