Advanced Search Results

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Educational to Commercial purpose, the 1st respondent has rejected the trade licence. (iii) The Cantonments Act, 2006 (41/2006), Section 234 contemplates sanction for building plan; Section 244 contemplates restrictions of use of building without written permission of the … Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … built after taking previous sanction of the Board. As per Section 2 (d), a building means a house. Section 234 of the Act provides that no person shall erect a building on any land in a Cantonment without

Farzand Vs. Mohan Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225, 226, 233, 234, 235, 309 and 367; Uttar Pradesh Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Rules, 1951 - Rules 9, 21 and 32(2); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1968All67; (1970)ILLJ241All

rules - appointment made without consultation - held, appointment without consultation is not illegal - petition dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … grounds:(1) That the rules had not been framed after consultation with the High Court as required by Article 234 of the Constitution. (2) That the rules with respect to appointments to the Judicial Service can only be

J.G. Harman and Co. Vs. Shankar Dat Dube

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All245

January 1895. Civil Procedure Code, Sections 234, 244, 278, 283 - Execution of decree--Representative of deceased judgment-debtor--Practice--Appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Abdur Rahman Vs. Shankar Dat Dube

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All162

judgment-debtor--Application after death of judgment-debtor to bring his representatives on to the record of the execution proceedings--Procedure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … is really decided by the ruling above referred to. It was there held by the Full Bench that Section 234 of the Code of Civil Procedure applied only to cases in which after the death of the judgment-debtor

Emperor Vs. Ibrahim Khan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.186

course of 12 months--One charge for the gross sum misappropriated--Procedure--Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 407. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the charge so framed shall be deemed to be a charge of one offence within the meaning of Section 234. Provided that the time included between the first and the last of such dates shall not exceed one

Administrator General, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad Vs. Late Dharamvir Ali ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Administrator General Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 212, 213(1) and (2), 232, 234, 370, 371, 372, 383 and 384; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR1997All158

letter of Administration - ground that person seeking succession certificate is not next of kin is invalid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … satisfy itself whether the applicants were universal legatees or residuary legatees, Under the provisions of Sections 232 and 234 of the said Act (the Act No. XXXIX of 1925 in short) before Letters of Administration can be

Sheo Charan Vs. Panna Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1923All41; (1923)ILR45All84; 70Ind.Cas.917

Land Revenue Act (111 of 1901), Section 234, rules made under - Rule 23, meaning of--Landlord's remuneration. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

S.L.Seth Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

be alleged against the respondent No.4. However, the respondent No.4 has contended that action was taken under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (herein after referred to as '2006 Act'). Similarly, the respondent No.5 by filing a separate return, has contended … the application, the notice of erection of building submitted by the petitioners. However, analogous provisions are made under Section 234 of the 2006 Act. Under sub-section (4) of Section 238 of the 2006 Act, yet another ground has

Bhagwan Dei Vs. Murari Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1917)ILR39All51

- (Indian Contract Act), Section 23 Contract--Agreement opposed to public policy--Assignment of mortgage taken by a patwari. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … son, the patwari, and have dismissed the suit on the ground that the assignment was against public policy. Section 234 of the Laud Revenue Act provides that the Board of Revenue may, from lime to time, subject to