Advanced Search Results

Ragiboyina Bhulakshmi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 19(3), 22 and 233; Constitution of India - Article 243

Reported in : 2002(4)ALT496

under Article 233 all disputes regarding election must be resolved through election petition only - appeal dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Farzand Vs. Mohan Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225, 226, 233, 234, 235, 309 and 367; Uttar Pradesh Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Rules, 1951 - Rules 9, 21 and 32(2); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1968All67; (1970)ILLJ241All

rules - appointment made without consultation - held, appointment without consultation is not illegal - petition dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … this case a Bench of the Rajasthan High Court held that consultation with the High Court under Article 233 means consultation with the full Court and not with a committee consisting of the Chief Justice and a

Ram Charitra Vs. Mohan Dei and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyOther Taxes

Reported in : AIR1923All210; (1923)ILR45All309

hut subsequently decreed in appeal--No information given to revenue court--Subsequent suit for recovery of share not maintainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … The only defence to the suit with which we are now concerned is that it was barred by Section 233(k) of the Land Revenue Act. This was the view taken by the lower appellate court, and, in our

Bhup NaraIn and anr. Vs. NaraIn Dass

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All330

1901 (Land Revenue Act), Section 233(k) - Suit for partition of Dera and site--Civil and Revenue Courts--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Baldeo Sahai and ors. Vs. Rahtu Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1921)ILR43All454

Revenue Act), Sections 106, 233(k) - Partition of isolated plot in abadi--Owners not Co-sharers--Civil and Revenue Courts--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Erlapati Veera Lakshmi Vs. Guda Haritha Rani

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 19(3), 20, 21(2), 22, 22(1), 233 and 268; Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 243O; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election Tribunals in respect of Gram Panchayats, Mandal Parishads and Zilla Parishads) Rules, 1995 - Rules 1(3), 2(1), 2(2), 3, 4 and 12

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD366; 2008(2)ALT604

the Writ Petition is restored to file for consideration afresh.Accordingly, the Review Petition is allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … authority and in such manner as provided for under any law made by the Legislature of a State.21. Section 233 of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, provides for such forum and the procedure under which the elections

Madho Dube and ors. Vs. Bahadur Khan and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1946All514

the decision of the learned single Judge is correct and we, therefore, dismiss this appeal with costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … suit. With regard to the second point the learned single Judge of this Court has held that Section 233(k), Land Revenue Act, did not bar the suit. In the result, the learned single Judge affirmed the decrees

Challa Satyanarayana Vs. Tadi Lakshmana Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 19(3), 22(1) and 233; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14, Rule 2; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election Tribunals in respect of Gram Panchayats, Mandal Parishads and Zilla Parishads) Rules, 1995 - Rules 3 and 7(2)

Reported in : 2008(1)ALT435

brevity), by reason of having three children, first respondent approached the Election Tribunal-and-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narsapur, under Section 233 of the Act. In the said election petition being EOP No. 4 of 2006, petitioner filed an application … the Tribunal does not warrant interference.The writ petition, with the above observations, is accordingly dismissed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

City Automobiles and anr. Vs. J.K. Industries Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 219 and 220(2)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)123; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)9

circumstances - no yardstick is provided for uniform application - held, filling of ten complaint is legal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Sections 221, 222 and 223 of the Code. I would say in answer to the question referred that Section 233 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the sections mentioned in it apply to trials of summons cases

Lal Bihari and ors. Vs. Parkali Kunwar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1920)ILR42All309

judloita--Joint mahal formed on partition--Suit by one eo-sharer against the other for exclusive possession of entire mahal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … partition.'4. The only other question to be considered, is whether the present suit offends against the provisions of section' 233 (k). of the Land Revenue Act. No papers relating to the partition were produced in this case, but