Advanced Search Results

Gulzari Lal Vs. Daya Ram and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All46

decree - Transfer of decree--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 232, 244--Appeal--Act III of 1877 (Registration Act), Section 28. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Hansraj Pal and Mukhraji Kunwar and ors. Vs. Dalpat Pal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1908)ILR30All28

Procedure Code, Section 232 - Decree for possession of immovable property--Sale of property decreed--Right to execute decree. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Sat NaraIn Singh and ors. Vs. Kayastha Trading and Banking Corporation ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1921)ILR43All433

up--Execution 'put in force'--Attachment made beforebut sale after the date of the commencement of the winding up--Liquidator--Appeal--Practice. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the Code of Civil Procedure.4. The point taken under the Companies Act is based upon the wording of Section 232, considered along with Section 168 of the said Act. According to the earlier of these two sections the

Administrator General, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad Vs. Late Dharamvir Ali ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Administrator General Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 212, 213(1) and (2), 232, 234, 370, 371, 372, 383 and 384; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR1997All158

letter of Administration - ground that person seeking succession certificate is not next of kin is invalid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Will to satisfy itself whether the applicants were universal legatees or residuary legatees, Under the provisions of Sections 232 and 234 of the said Act (the Act No. XXXIX of 1925 in short) before Letters of Administration

Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)16VST387(Raj)

which came into existence after the commencement of the Constitution constituting municipalities or other institutions of self-governance like cantonments, notified area or panchayats had provided for levy and collection of octroi, that is to say, tax on … case of Atiabari Tea Co. AIR 1961 SC 232. It is equally important to note that in … commodities on which the levy of tax under the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1999 was extended. The petitioner is aggrieved with the levy of tax under the Act of 1999 on … uxjh; fudk;ksa }kjk O;kikfjd xfrfo/k;ksa dks Facilitate djus gsrq o'kZ 2005&06 o 2006&2007 esa fd;s x;s O;; dh lwpuk miyC/k djkus ckcr A lUnHkZ% foHkkxh; … the local area and the phrase 'local area' has been defined in Section 2(14) of that Act to mean 'an area within the limits of

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

Matched in: Advocate F.S.Nariman, Adv. and ;Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Adv., i/b., ;Mahimtura and Co. in Writ Petition No. 1957, 2196, 2937 of 2006, ;J.J.Bhatt, Sr. Adv., ;Anjali Chandurkar, Adv., i/b., ;Kanga and Co. in Writ Petit Ravi Kadam, Adv. General and K.R. Belosey, G.P. K.K. Singhavi, Sr. Adv. with Priti Purandare, Adv. for respondent Municipal Corporation.in Writ Petition Nos. 1957 2937, 2093, 2111, 2930, 2985, 2752, 2

Buddhan Singh and anr. Vs. Nabi Bux and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1962All43

legally - not refers to a person who has encroached upon the land of some other person. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … opinion of Bhagwati, J. in : [1955]2SCR374 . While giving to some general words in the amendment to Section 232(1) of the, Indian Companies Act a limited meaning, Bhagwati, J. observed :'Whereas before the amendment the secured creditor

Punnam Aruna Vs. Election Commission and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 210, 225, 225C, 225D, 225(1), 225(2), 232 and 233; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1994 - Rule 69; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Members and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayats, Members of Mandal Parishads and Members of Zilla Parishads) Rules, 2006 - Rules 55, 56, 59 and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 243E and 324

Reported in : 2007(1)ALD284; 2007(1)ALT138

a period of four months from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … officer shall during that period, be subject to the control, superintendence and discipline of the State Election Commissioner.20. Section 232 of the Act dealing with power to delegate reads as hereunder:232. Power to delegate:- The (Andhra Pradesh Election

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

The Fact Limited vs Vadavukode Puthencruz Grama Panchayat

Court : Kerala

extends to whole of the State of Kerala, except the areas which are within the limits of the Cantonments, Nagar Panchayats, Municipal councils, Municipal Corporations and areas specified as industrial township under the proviso to clause (1) … the Panchayat has raised the demand after the period of 2005 - 2006, the said demand may not legally be sustainable for the reason that … Petroleum Corporation Limited v. State of Kerala and Others [2015 (1) KHC 769], wherein the licence fee under section 232 of Act, 1996 r/w rule 7 of Rules, 1996 and the permit fee under section 233 r/w rules