Advanced Search Results

Farzand Vs. Mohan Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225, 226, 233, 234, 235, 309 and 367; Uttar Pradesh Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Rules, 1951 - Rules 9, 21 and 32(2); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1968All67; (1970)ILLJ241All

rules - appointment made without consultation - held, appointment without consultation is not illegal - petition dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … it certain other powers in respect of the executive business relating to the administration of justice By Article 225, the Constitution preserves, the powers of its Judges in relation to the administration of justice in the Court

Queen-empress Vs. Kandhaia and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All67

illegal--Act XLV of 1860 (Penal Code), Sections 40, 224, 225--Criminal Procedure Code, Sections 55, 110, 117, 118. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Hari Shankar Dubey

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC553; (2002)1UPLBEC790

- held, Section 5 has to be construed liberally but not in the absence of material facts. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … for the respondent-writ petitioner on the delay condonation petition.2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 225 days in preferring special appeal against the order passed by the learned single Judge allowing the writ petition.

A. Srinath and Others Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution Civil Subject:

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 47, Rules 1, 5, 6 and 9 - Order IX; Constitution of India - Articles 26, 162, 246, 225, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 15, 44, 114, 117 and 141; Andhra State Act, 1953; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 107, 108 and 108(1); Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 223; Trade Marks Act; Indian High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 13; General Clauses Act - Sections 8; Interpretation Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1882 - Sections 540, 623, 624 and 627; States Reorganisation Act;

Reported in : AIR1996AP309; 1996(2)ALT893; (1997)ILLJ255AP

- disregard on Court's part of instructions issued by State Government - cannot be ground for review. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Constitution of India has created the extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 and in Article 225 thereof provided: 'Subject to the provisions of this Constitution and to the provisions of any law of the

Darshan Singh Vs. Parbhu Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1946All67

in the name of the plaintiff. The parties shall bear their own costs in both the Courts. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … though separate, and none for people more remotely related. In Jangi Nath v. Janki Nath ('5) 2 A.L.J. 225, their Lordships have condemned the practice of drawing an inference from an act of kindness, unfavourable to the

Union of India Vs. Ibrahim UddIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114(g), 58, 17 to 31, 68, 65, 74, 90; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 ; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Section 43A

Kaur, AIR 2005 SC 534; R.M. Yellatti v. Assistant Executive Engineer AIR 2006 SC 355; and Pratap Singh & Anr. v. State of M.P., AIR … Ors. v. Badkulal & Ors., AIR 1953 SC 225; A. Raghavamma & Anr. v. A. Chenchamma & … on the Will, which was liable to be ignored altogether and making reference to the record of the Cantonment Board. In case, the Union of India did not produce the revenue record before the trial Court, the … over the suit land illegally and in an unauthorised manner on 22.2.1993 and afterwards, thus the cause of action arose to approach the court.B. The defendant no.1/appellant filed the written statement denying the averments and ownership of … adverse inference was drawn against it in view of the provisions of Section 114 clause(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter called the Evidence

National Insurance Co.Ltd. Cantonment Road, Cuttac Vs. Krushna Chandra ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Motor Vehicles

the Additional District Judge, Cuttack-cum-1STMotor Accident Claims Tribunal in M.A.C. No.656 of 2006. ……..… National Insurance Co. Ltd., Cantonment Road, Cuttack … Appellant … Respondents -versusKrushna Chandra Sahoo and Others. For Appellant : M/s. Goutam Misra, & … Heard and disposed of on 20.12.2012 B.N.MAHAPATRA, J.This is an appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) filed by the Insurance Company against the award dated 28.11.2011 passed … Basheer Ahmed and others Vs. Mohammed Jameel and another, (2009) 2 SCC 225.it is submitted that if the ratio of the above decisions of the

Raju Kapoor Vs. Mangt. of M/S Janata Coop. Bank

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of the respondent tantamounted to retrenchment. Reliance was placed on the decision of the Division Bench in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Others, 2006 (88) DRJ 7.(DB). The Court also considered the submission … Faridabad vs. Presiding Officer & Another, 1998 (3) Supreme Court Cases page 225 wherein it has been held that from the letter of appointment it … that his termination was in violation of principles of natural justice, and Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act for short).3. The stand of the respondent management was that the petitioner had been appointed as

Societe Des Produits Nestle, S.a and anr. Vs. Montu Sadhu and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

over 800 million 2 finger KITKAT bars sold in the UK i.e. over 2 million everyday;  In 2006, KITKAT bagged the platinum award at the marketing effectiveness awards. The Judge rated it as Asia‟s most effective … Nestlé, S.A., is a company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland having its registered office at 1800, Vevey, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland. The plaintiff No.2, Nestlé India Limited, is a Company incorporated under The Companies Act, 1956 … has a statutory right of exclusive use thereof under the provision of Section 28(1) of The Trade Marks Act, 1999, (hereinafter referred to as “