Advanced Search Results

Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Section 57; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

order dated 20th February 2009 whereby in exercise of its power to review under Section 57 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 („CA 2006) the Government of India („GOI) in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) (Respondent No.1) set aside a

Thondi Ram Vs. Lachman

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All382

execution'--Act XV of 1877 (Limitation Act), Schedule ii., No. 179 (4)--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 223, 228, 273. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Jagan Nath Vs. Tirbeni Sahai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All41

- Act (Local) No. III of 1901, (United Provinces Land Revenue Act), Section 223(k)--Partition--Civil and Revenue Courts--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate 1. These thirteen petitions presented under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority … RIZWAN ULLAH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate CRL.L.P. 223/2015 DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD Through: Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus RIZWAN

S. Shakuntala and anr. Vs. Addl. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilMunicipal Tax

Acts : Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 220(2), 222, 223, 223(3), 282 and 282(2)

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT723

accordingly allowed, but, in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … petitioners, necessary orders were passed on the complaint, which resulted in issuing of the demand in terms of Section 223 of the Act, therefore, the impugned demand cannot be said to be illegal or without basis. He, however,

Gangadharanandagiri Swamiji Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 324, 341, 4111 and 414; Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 190(1), 218, 219, 222, 223, 319 and 351

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)680; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)136; 2002CriLJ3446

Magistrate under the impugned order.20. For the foregoing reasons, the Criminal Revision Case fails and is dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 218 - 222 deal with joinder of charges in respect of various offences committed by a single person. Section 223, however, deals with plurality of persons, who can be tried together, in other words, the joint trial of

Atwari and anr. Vs. Maiku Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All1; 1Ind.Cas.553

Cause Court, transferred to Munsif's Court for execution--Appeal--Provincial Small Cause Court's Act (IX of 1887), Section 27. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the Court of Small Causes sent the decree to the Munsif's Court for execution under the provisions of Section 223 of the Code of Civil Procedure, An application for execution was accordingly made in the Munsif's Court. Objections

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

under this Act relating to juvenile in conflict with law. Section 18(i) further provides that notwithstanding contained in Section 223 of the Code or any other law for the time being in force, no juvenile shall be charged … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula

K.Soman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Right to Information

that the procedure adopted is not proper. When the question as to whether this can be brought under Section 223 (d) of the Code was put to them by this Court, both the counsel submitted that in the … AS3D ACCUSED IN SC.NO.916/2012: -------------------------------------------------- K.SOMAN, S/O.KOCHAPPY, THOTTIVILA VEEDU, ADAYAMAN, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOW RESIDING AT POLICE QUARTERS NO.G5 CANTONMENT HOUSE, VIKAS BHAVAN PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.S.M.PRASANTH SMT.ASHA BABU SMT.AMMU CHARLES SRI.M.MANOJKUMAR (CHELAKKADAN) RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: … Prosecutor, the conspiracy hatched in both the cases are same and the act of disappearance of evidence and creation of false documents to cover up

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Hubballi and Another Vs. The Totag ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Direct Taxation

because sub-section (4) inserted in Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act with effect from 01st April 2007 by Finance Act, 2006 excludes Co-operative Banks other than Primary Agricultural Credit Society or a Primary Co-Operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank … Officer, reported in (2010) 322 ITR 283 SC : (2010) 3 SCC 223 for the preceding years, namely Assessment Years 1991-1992 to 1999-2000 (except Assessment … the consumers within the limits of a municipal corporation, municipality, municipal committee, notified area committee, town area or cantonment. (3) In a case where the assessee is entitled also to the deduction under section 80HH or section