Advanced Search Results

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … at intermediate level. It exercises power and discharges functions qua villages included within the Mandal and defined under Section 222 of the 1994 Act. Within a district, there are more than one Mandal and each Mandal has a

Emperor Vs. Ibrahim Khan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.186

course of 12 months--One charge for the gross sum misappropriated--Procedure--Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 407. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a re-trial of the case. The question raised in the case involves the true construction of Clause (2), Section 222, Criminal Procedure Code.2. The accused Ibrahim Khan was a naib daruga employed in the Meerut Cantoments, and the

Emperor Vs. Gulzari Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All254

No. XLV of 1860 (Indian Penal Code), Section 406--Criminal breach of trust--Charge--Criminal Procedure Code, Sections 222, 231. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate 1. These thirteen petitions presented under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority … + versus MAHESH JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate CRL.L.P. 222/2015 DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate versus RIZWAN

Kishan Prasad Palaypu Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 43A, 73(2), 113(2), 159, 160, 161, 162, 162(1), 162(2), 168, 205A(1), 210, 220, 220(1), 220(2), 220(3) and 610; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act; Mines Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 472 and 482

Reported in : [2007]139CompCas536(AP); [2008]83SCL376(AP)

company for the offence alleged and is governed by Section 472 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Division Bench of the Calcutta in National Cotton Mills v. Assistant Registrar of Companies [1984] 56 Comp Cas 222, and single judge judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Chandra Spinning and Weaving Mills P. Ltd. v.

Emperor Vs. Nazir Khan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1914)ILR36All1

Penal Code), Section 498 - Enticing away a married woman--Quantum of evidence necessary to prove the marriage. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … been divorced by Haidar Khan, unless the contrary has been proved, no conviction under the section can stand. 222 166. There a Division Bench of this Court held that, the court should require some better evidence of

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … Alabama, 1789-1901, pp. 217-232 (1955); Hunter v. Underwood , 471 U. S. 222 (1985).[ Footnote 4 ] Not wishing to run directly afoul of the … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

Sri Gopinath Vs. Sri. Mohan Shah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings, (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act 1960 - Sections 22; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1960 - Sections 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : 2001(6)ALT287

requiring premises to run his own business for a long time - sufficient to constitute bonafide requirement. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Learned counsel also had placed strong reliance on : [1985]2SCR102 equivalent to : [1985]2SCR102 , (1998) 6 SCC 222, : [2001]2SCR134 , and also AIR SCW 2001 1267.7. Sri Saradhi learned counsel representing Smt. Jayasree Saradhi representing

Budh Sen Vs. Sheel Chandra Agarwal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 and 100

Reported in : AIR1978All88

tenant - notice of termination of tenancy has to be served separately on each of common tenant. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … joint tenants but as tenants in common. Mulla in his Transfer of Property Act, Sixth Edition at page 222 clearly brings out the distinction between 'joint tenants' and 'tenants in common' in the following words:-- 'A joint

In Re: Raghubir Saran

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1949CriLJ852

the rate of bs. 160 per day for the days on which the case was actually heard. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … had struck him of the roll. I need only refer to King v. Greenwood (1760) 1 W. Bl. 222 in which it was held that the stricking of the roll was not to be understood as a