Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 221 · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 05 1975

Official Liquidator Vs. Swarup Cold Storage

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-05-1975

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172, 148 and 221; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 125

Reported in : AIR1976All88

of the partner - company goes into liquidation - held, partner not entitled to invoke the lien. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a partner and in circumstances like the present the appellant was entitled to invoke the lien contemplated by Section 221 of the Contract Act and thereunder to retain possession till his dues were paid off. The Division Bench

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1966

Om Prakash Agarwal Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-21-1966

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220(4), 220(6), 221 and 221(1)

Reported in : AIR1968All82; [1967]66ITR175(All)

on the grounds that application was not disposed of before making the order of penalty on assessee. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … on November 18, 1965 calling upon him to show cause why a penalty should not be levied under Section 221(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The notice required the petitioner to appear personally or through an authorised representative

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-09-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 2015

Khaja Kutubuddin Khan S/O Late Khaja Moi Vs. The Secunderabad Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-19-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

said premises without notice and without following due process of law, contrary to the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (referred to as new Act) and in violation of Article 300- A of the constitution of India. Petitioners … late Khaja Moinuddin Khan R/o 699, Khaja Mansion, Road No.36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad and another Petitioners The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Court compound, S P Road, SEcunderabad Rep by its Chief Executive Officer and others . Respondents Counsel … was established and was functioning for long time. On 6.4.2001 notice under Section 185 of Cantonment Act 1924 (referred to as Old Act) was issued

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2001

City Automobiles and anr. Vs. J.K. Industries Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-13-2001

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 219 and 220(2)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)123; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)9

circumstances - no yardstick is provided for uniform application - held, filling of ten complaint is legal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under Sub-section (5) thereof, the provisions of Section 71 of the Indian Penal Code have been specifically delved. Section 221 deals with the cases where the nature of the acts complained are such that it is doubtful that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2008

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-27-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Amir Hasan Vs. Ahmad Ali

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All36

of decree--Review of judgment--Stay of execution, pending application for review--Jurisdiction--Civil Procedure Code, Section 623--'Any other sufficient reason.' - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … In the case of Reasut Hosein v. Hadjee Abdoollah in the Privy Council, L. R., 3 Ind. Ap., 221, an appeal from the High Court of Bengal, their Lordships said, when discussing the somewhat similar provisions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2013

State of U.P. Thru Secy. Lucknow Vs. Jagdish Chandra

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-19-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924), means that State Government." Section 11 of the Act, 1976 deals with payment of … not taken away the accrued right of a person. In G.P. Singh's Principles of Statutory Interpretation (10th Edn.) 2006 at Page 631, it is stated: "Under the common law rule the consequences of repeal of a statute … Ltd. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors, AIR 1953, SC 221. In the above case, the appellant was assessed by the Assistant Commissioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2026

Sarita Tiwari vs M/S Deccan Charters Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

2006 LLR 223 and Raj Kumar Rastogi v P.O. Labour Court-X, (2015) 221 DLT 242, and therefore, such finding does not call for reversal by … rendered by learned Single Judges of thisCourt. To the contrary, a Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board v. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Ors. [2006 (88) DRJ 75 (DB)], has given a clear finding … and order has,however, directed that the amount paid to the appellant under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) shall not be recovered.4. At this juncture, we may note that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial