Advanced Search Results

Sms Schloemann Siemag, A.G. Vs. Dy. Cit and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]250ITR97(AP)

Andhra Pradesh High Court (Full Bench) Satya Brata Sinha C.J., B. Subhashan Reddy & S.R. Nayak, JJ. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a Division Bench of this court having regard to the importance of theuestion as regards the interpretation of section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act' for brevity). Although all the

Sripat NaraIn Rai Vs. Board of Revenue, U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rules 4 and 5; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 7(2), 219, 220 and 220(3); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 232; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1951 - Rules 186 and 239; Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 273; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : AIR1960All93

Act not within the ambit of U. P. Land Revenue Act and Section 220 cannot be invoked. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Om Prakash Agarwal Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220(4), 220(6), 221 and 221(1)

Reported in : AIR1968All82; [1967]66ITR175(All)

on the grounds that application was not disposed of before making the order of penalty on assessee. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Income-tax Officer could consider the question of imposing a penalty under Section 221(1). The contention is well founded.2. Section 220(1) requires that the amount specified as payable in a notice of demand must be paid within thirtyfive days

City Automobiles and anr. Vs. J.K. Industries Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 219 and 220(2)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)123; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)9

circumstances - no yardstick is provided for uniform application - held, filling of ten complaint is legal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … made by the complainant on the dishonouring of the cheques by giving one lawyer's notice, the provisions of Section 220 of the Code would attract, repelling the contention that the complaint was hit by Section 219 of the

Anand Samrat Company, Rep. by Its Partner, Mr. G. Padma Rao Vs. the Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220(2) and 220(2A); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : [2002]253ITR171(AP); [2001]118TAXMAN480(AP)

and passed appropriate reasoned Order - Court remitted matter to ITC with direction to dispose of afresh. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax, Andhra Pradesh-II, Hyderabad, the 1st respondent herein dated 21.2.2000 made under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act (for short `the Act') rejecting the application of the petitioner filed under the

N. Lakshmanan and ors. Vs. Sri Shanmukha Cotton Traders and anr.,

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalCommercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141 and 141(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 220

Reported in : 1998(2)ALT(Cri)494; [2000]102CompCas154(AP)

be charged and tried for every offence - held, petitioner liable to be charged for every cheque. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … cheques were returned on only one day, i.e., March 10, 1997. Therefore, the case on hand falls under Section 220 of the Code. The facts of the case on hand are similar and the point raised is squarely

Husaini Begam Vs. the Collector of Muzaffarnagar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : LimitationCivil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All11

Appeal - Admission after time--Act XV of 1877 (Limitation Act), Section 5--'Sufficient cause'--Poverty--Pardah-nashin--Civil Procedure Code, Section 220--Costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

The Trivandrum Chamber of Commerce and Industry, vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

is pertinent to note that, by the order dated18.01.2013 in SLP(Civil)No.8519 of 2006 [Union of India v. State of Gujarat and others], the Apex Court … materials and shall protect such roads and public paths from encroachment.As per the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act 1994 Section 220, no person shall build any wall or erect any fence or other obstruction or projection or make any … THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, POLICE GROUND, C.V. RAMAN PILLAI ROAD, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695014. 4 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, CONTONMENT STATION ROAD, STATUE, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695001. ADDL. R5. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT

Kishan Prasad Palaypu Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 43A, 73(2), 113(2), 159, 160, 161, 162, 162(1), 162(2), 168, 205A(1), 210, 220, 220(1), 220(2), 220(3) and 610; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act; Mines Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 472 and 482

Reported in : [2007]139CompCas536(AP); [2008]83SCL376(AP)

company for the offence alleged and is governed by Section 472 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … question referred to this Bench is a simple one, 'whether failure to comply with the statutory requirement of Section 220 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') can be said to be a continuing offence or

Raasi Cement Ltd. Vs. Cit (No. 3)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2006]156TAXMAN74(AP)

Matched in: Citation [2006]156TAXMAN74(AP)