Advanced Search Results

Queen-empress Vs. Muhammad Shah Khan and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1898)ILR20All307

Code), Section 218 - Public servant framing incorrect record--Injury to the public--Police officer framing a false report. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Queen-empress Vs. Nand Kishore

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1897)ILR19All305

Penal Code), Section 218 - Offence--Public servant framing an incorrect record to save himself from legal punishment. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Co-operat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)148CTR(AP)91

the Andhra Pradesh High Court S.V. Maruthi & T.N.C. Rangarajan, JJ. Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 37(1) - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. CIT (1965) 57 ITR 521 (SC), Associated Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT (1996) 218 ITR 195 (SC) applied. Application: Applicable to the current assessment year as well. Dt.Ord.: 27-3-1998 A.Y.: 1982-83 Income

Naresh Kumar Bhati No. 14416501 (Dmt) Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

AS A MOTIVE Section 64 (e) FOR PROCURING THE ENROLMENT OF A PERSON. in that he, at Ambala Cantonment, on 14 July 2006 directly obtained for himself a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only) from Sh. … this complaint was also given to SSP, Bulandshahar, DIG Meerut and CO 218 Medium Regiment. Subsequently, Sh. Jai Prakash, father-in-law of the appellant attempted to … Martial (SCM) proceedings of 4th May 2007 wherein the petitioner was held guilty for three offences Under Army Act Section 64 (e) and was sentenced to be reduced to the Ranks, to suffer imprisonment for three months

G.S. Chooramani and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Government Estates Thekedari Abolition Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 31, 31(2), 31A and 226; Government Grants Act, 1895; Government Grants (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 3 and 6; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1969All43

and impugned notification challenged - notification abolishes lease - held, the impugned notification deserves to be quashed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … invalidity of a part will result in the failure of the whole. Vide Crawford on Statutory Construction, pp. 218-219.4. Likewise, when the valid and invalid parts of a statute are independent and do not form part of

Shahjahan Khan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1956 - Rules 26 and 29; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 366 and 376

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC598; [2002(93)FLR147]; (2002)1UPLBEC902

not be a conclusive evidence for second marriage i.e bigamy and petitioner reinstated with full back wages. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … SC 1087, AIR 1990 SC 781, AIR 1983 SC 1246, 1996 (6) SCC 44 and AIR 1985 SC 218, Hence, the aforesaid decision is clearly distinguishable.11. It may be mentioned that the misconducts for which a Government

T.V. Venugopal Vs. Ushodaya Enterprises and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 26 - Order 7, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 14, 17, 30, 34, 35, 40, 41, 44, 45, 45(1), 50, 51, 55, 62, 62(1), 72 and 72(2); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 4, 12(3), 27, 105 and 106; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 10(1), 11, 12, 12(1), 12(3), 18, 27(1), 34 and 46 - Schedule - Rules 12 and 26; Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules; Specific Relief Act - Sections 41 and 41(1)

Reported in : 2001(2)ALT42

suit with costs. In view of this judgment, C.C.C.A. No. 180 of 2000 stands dismissed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … extensively criticised by Manning J. in the case of Henderson v. Radio Corporation Pty. Reported in (1969) RPC 218 holding that it would be unsafe to adopt the view expressed in Mc. Culloch v. Mary that what

Kashmi K.Alex Vs. Local Registrar of Births and Deaths

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

address shown in the writ petition. She passed SSLC in the year 2006 as evident from Exts.P2 and P3 and passed the B.Sc degree in … NO.413/3/S-3/2012 DATED24JULY-2012. EXHIBIT P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION DATED208/2013 ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE CANTONMENT BOARD , BADAMLABAGH CANNT., SRINAGAR. EXHIBIT-P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.A6-2014/14 DATED0505.2014 ISSUED BY THE1T RESPONDENT. … -:2:- issue the birth certificate since the birth records prior to 1999 was not available and, therefore, no action can be taken. Thereafter the petitioner's father approached various authorities in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. However, … by a non-speaking order vide Ext.P7. The petitioner points out as per Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 r/w. Rule

ChaIn Singh Vs. Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Land Acquisition

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. CIMA No. 218 OF 200.Chain Singh Petitioners Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board & ors … the premises, which was otherwise, in law, impermissible.17. The view taken by this Court in Beant Singh v. Cantonment Executive Officer, Jammu, reported as AIR 196.Jammu and Kashmir, 83 reads thus: The learned counsel for the appellant … Devi Dharmarth Trust at annual rent of Rs. 15,000/-. After the Jammu and Kashmir Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Act, 1986 (Governors Act, later replaced by the Act of legislature in 1988), the petitioner claimed to have become … observations referred to above were in connection with a Suit filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 or analogous provisions in the