Advanced Search Results

Jami Appala Swamy and anr. Vs. Regional Transport Authority and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 86(5), 95 and 96; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 217

Reported in : AIR2003AP265; 2003(2)ALD324; 2003(2)ALT270

be levied RTA could not enhance such amounts - resolutions passed without jurisdiction - resolutions struck down. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Transport Authorities, revising the existing compounding fee and enhancing the same in purported exercise of power under Rule 217 of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (for short 'the Rules') as bad, illegal, arbitrary and without

Rekha Timber Depot Vs. Deputy Commercial Taxes Officer and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(4C), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 21(2) and 21(6); Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1985; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1999; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 31, 31A and 36; Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 30; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166(3) and 217(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 226 and 227

Reported in : [2003]129STC267(AP)

delay is procedural in nature held, it cannot be said that amendment violates right under Article 14. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … an act.26. In VINOD GURUDAS RAIKAR's case (9 supra), the Supreme Court was considering the provisions of Sections 217(1) and 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 relating to filing of claim petition and the limitation within

In Re: Scope and Extent of Applicability of Flag Code and Use of Natio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 4 and 214 to 231

Reported in : AIR1994All10

status as Chief Justice - held, not allowing Puisne Judges to use National Flag is wholly arbitrary. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … High1 Court concerned for appropriate action.25. Petition allowed. Constitution - National Flag on vehicles - Articles 14 and 217 of Constitution of India - right of Puisne Judges to fly National Flag on their vehicles - Puisne

Ramakrishna Cine Studio Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 217 and 246(1)

Reported in : [1998]233ITR277(AP)

Application : Also to current assessment year. A.Y. : 1980-81 and 1981-82 Income Tax Act 1961 s.246(1) - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … held that the film subsidy received is revenue receipt. The assessee also contended that levy of interest under Section 217 of the Income-tax Act is not justified, while the Revenue contended that in the assessment year 1980-81, the

Santosh Kumar and Others Etc. Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Meerut ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 87, 100(4), 101, 133(2), 217 and 217(2), ; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 1-A, C and D, 41(6), 68-C, D, E, F & F(2) and 69-F; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1969 - Sections 76, 135 and 135(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1991All28

that the omission of such a provision in the new Act was deliberately made by the Parliament. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … been repealed and a saving clause has been enacted in form of sub-section (2) of the same section. Section 217 of the New Act is quoted below:'217: Repeal and Savings:-- (1) The Motor Vehicles Act 1939 (4 of

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Haldwani Vs. Dhanram Singh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173 and 217(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110-B, 110-D and 217; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 56; Limitation Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Arbitration Act, 1940; Goa, Daman and Diu Civil Courts Act, 1965

Reported in : 1990ACJ41; AIR1990All30; [1993]76CompCas624(All)

appeal saved - procedures for appeal not saved - appellant shall comply with the new procedural conditions. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'New Act') was enforced w.e.f. 1-7-1989 and under S. 217 of the new Act the 1939 Act was specifically repealed in the new Act an appeal is provided

Maharshi Avadhesh Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 75, 124, 124(4), 226, 227, 309, 311, 370, 371, 371A, B, C, D, E and F; Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3 and 3(1)

Reported in : AIR1991All52

exchange of daughter of Union Home Minister - discretion of Government - no relief can be granted. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … negotiations with the terrorists may be dispensed with. A Judge of the High Court is appointed under Art. 217 of the Constitution by the President. He holds a constitutional office and he can be removed from office

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia … Ala. 1966); see also M. McMillian, Constitutional Development in Alabama, 1789-1901, pp. 217-232 (1955); Hunter v. Underwood , 471 U. S. 222 (1985).[ Footnote 4

G.S. Chooramani and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Government Estates Thekedari Abolition Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 31, 31(2), 31A and 226; Government Grants Act, 1895; Government Grants (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 3 and 6; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1969All43

and impugned notification challenged - notification abolishes lease - held, the impugned notification deserves to be quashed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … rest has become unenforceable. Vide Cooley's Constitutional Limitations, Vol. 1, at pp. 360-361; Craw-ford on Statutory Construction, pages 217-218.3. Even when the provisions which are valid are distinct and separate from those which are invalid, if they

Baru Mal JaIn and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 11, 12 and 12(2)

Reported in : AIR1962All61

first award. In the circumstances of this case I direct the parties to bear their own costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … v. Special Collector, Twante, AIR 1936 Rang 206 and Sujan Singh v. Secretary of State, (AIR 1936 Pesh 217). When the Act does not give the Land Reforms Commissioner any power to interfere he cannot do so