Advanced Search Results

Cit Vs. Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)173CTR(AP)136; [2001]253ITR68(AP)

Income Tax Act 1961 s.4 In the Andhra Pradesh High Court S.R. Nayak & Ananda Reddy, JJ. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … v. Pandavapura Sahakara Sakkare Kharkane Ltd. (1992) 198 ITR 690 (Karn) and Somaiya Orgeno-Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT (1995) 216 ITR 291 (Bom) followed. Application: Also to current assessment year. Decision: In favour of assessee. Income Tax Act

State vs.subash Gupta & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

evidence of ASI Saheb Singh (PW-21) that from noon on 22nd June 2006 to 23rd June 2006, Vibhore Singh, Hemant Kalra and Vijay Mohan were … the offences under Sections 302/364/301 IPC. A-1 was, however, acquitted of the offence under Section 120-B IPC and Section 216 read with Section 34 IPC. 1.2 The appeal by A-1 is also directed against the order on sentence … said bangle as belonging to either SS or DG. The mere fact that A-3 was arrested from Delhi Cantonment is again an insufficient circumstance. It has come in the evidence of ASI Saheb Singh (PW-21) that from … he found at the site of his father‟s office at MCD, Okhla. Acting on the above complaint, FIR No.340/1996 (Ex.PW-4/B) was registered by PW-133. An

Subash Gupta vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

evidence of ASI Saheb Singh (PW-21) that from noon on 22nd June 2006 to 23rd June 2006, Vibhore Singh, Hemant Kalra and Vijay Mohan were … the offences under Sections 302/364/301 IPC. A-1 was, however, acquitted of the offence under Section 120-B IPC and Section 216 read with Section 34 IPC. 1.2 The appeal by A-1 is also directed against the order on sentence … said bangle as belonging to either SS or DG. The mere fact that A-3 was arrested from Delhi Cantonment is again an insufficient circumstance. It has come in the evidence of ASI Saheb Singh (PW-21) that from … he found at the site of his father‟s office at MCD, Okhla. Acting on the above complaint, FIR No.340/1996 (Ex.PW-4/B) was registered by PW-133. An

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

HOTHUR TRADERS, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (ADMN), NO.5, 6, 7 & 8, BESIDE NANDI SCHOOL, INFANTRY ROAD, CANTONMENT, BELLARY. M/S. MEHBOOB TRANSPORT COMPANY, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (ADMN), NO.5, 6, 7 & 8, BESIDE NANDI … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA Writ Petition Nos.2642/2009 (GM-MM-S) c/w 44793/2013, 13595/2008, 13516/2008, 13654/2008, 13803/2008, … IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL

Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. P. Hanumantha Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 474

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)332; 2006CriLJ1675

Matched in: Citation 2006(1)ALD(Cri)332; 2006CriLJ1675

Sub Insp. (Min) S.Bhaskaran Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force (BSF) Rules - Rule 19; Constitution of India - Article 142

finally decided by the Supreme Court on 4.1.2006; decision being reported as 2006 SCC (L &S;) 216 Raj Kumar & Ors. v. UOI & Anr; … 9.12.2010 it was directed that a Board of Doctors at the Command Army Hospital (Research and Referral) Delhi Cantonment would examine the petitioner and submit a report in Court.15. The petitioner appeared before a Board of Doctors … for a period of 12 weeks with effect from 4.5.2008. The petitioner alleges that the Unit Medical Officer acted out of malice inasmuch as petitioner had a verbal altercation with him. Petitioner asserts that the Unit Medical … 142 of the Constitution in order to do complete justice to a Section of the Personnel who would otherwise be placed in an inequitable situation

M/S Advik Industries Ltd. (Formerly Du-lite Safety Services Pvt. Ltd.) ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

complainant applied for allotment of Second Floor of the commercial Space/Unit No. 216, Super Area 3493 sq.ft., in œUppals Element 9? in the Office Use … Iron Works Pvt. Ltd. and Anr., AIR 2009 (1) SCR 1109, (2) judgments of this Commission in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. S.K. Kapoor and Associates, in Revision Petition Nos. 2501 and 2669 of 2004, decided on 26.10.2006, … controversy in this case swirls around the question, œWhether the complainant is a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986?? 2. M/s. Advik Industries Ltd. (Formerly known as Du-Lite Safety Services Pvt. Ltd.), the complainant is a … was handed over to the complainant. Ultimately, this complaint was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, on 22.07.2011. 3. We have