Advanced Search Results

Jokhu Tewari Vs. Jaggar Nath Pande

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All223

an appeal from a decree for pre-emption on the time limited for paying in the pre-emptive price. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in execution proceedings. The suit was one for pre-emption. The Court of First Instance made a decree under Section 214 of Act No. XIV of 1882, specifying the 1st of June 1892, as the day on or before

Reference Under Section 28 of Act No. Vii of 1870

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All238

Companies Act) Sections 169, 214 - Appeal--Court-fee--Act No. VII, 1870 (Court fees Act), Schedule ii, Article 11(b). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Balmukand Vs. Pancham

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All400

view, should have been made in the case. Pre-emption - Conditional decree--Appeal--Purchase-money-Costs--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 214, 583. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Sita Ram and ors. Vs. Madho Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All44

with the Transfer of Properly Act--Subsequent suit fur redemption not barred--Ciril Procedure Code, Sections 13, 214--Res judicata. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Khader Bee and ors. Vs. Mohammad Vazir and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214 and 214(2)

Reported in : 2001(2)ALT513

the E.P. and decide the matter on merits.7. The Civil Revision Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that falls for consideration in the present Civil Revision Petition is whether the Succession Certificate as contemplated under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is required for the purpose of executing a decree obtained in the

R. Wall and anr. Vs. J.E. Howard and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All215

Companies Act) Sections 162, 169, 214 - Appeal--Limitation--Act No. XV of 1877 (Indian Limitation Act), Section 12. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

P. Damodar Rao Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 214 to 226

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD799

or by recording reasons, in support of such conclusion. There shall be no order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … assessment as well as subsequent revision of property tax. An assessment book is required to be maintained under Section 214, wherein several particulars, in respect of buildings assessed to tax, are to be entered. They include, the area,

Matru Mal and anr. Vs. Tulsi Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All210

Court of Revenue--Ex-parte decision--Appeal--Objection filed after time limited by Court but before action taken under Section 113. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … first of these grounds was that the order in question was an order passed ex-parte, and that by Section 214 read with Section 219 no appeal lay. Sections 214 and 219 are sections which govern proceedings of a

Lalu Vs. Chhedi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All300

178, 179 - Execution of decree--Limitation--Decree for pre-emption--Time from which limitation begins to run against the decree-holder. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … put in possession of the property in suit. The decree was drawn up in the usual form under Section 214 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and one of the provisions of it was that on failure of

Koji Ram Vs. Ishur Das and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All354

Suit for pre-emption dismissed on appeal--Suit for refund of money paid into Court--Civil Procedure Code, Section 244. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … no question of section 244 can arise.3. This is not a sound contention, for by the provisions of section 214 it is enacted, that when in a pre-emption suit 'the Court finds for the plaintiff, if the amount