Advanced Search Results

Bijai Bahadur Singh Vs. Bhup Indar Bahadurr Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1897)ILR19All296

respondent. Civil Procedure Code, Section 211 - Execution of decree--Mesne profits-Interpretation of decree awarding 'future mesne profits.' - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Emperor Vs. Tabarak Zaman Khan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1908)ILR30All52

Sections 182, 211 - Criminal Procedure Code, Section 195--Information given to the police alleged to he false--Procedure--Notice. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Abdul Ghafur Vs. Raja Ram

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All262

of rents by a trespasser in possession not to be set off against mesne profits--Execution of decree. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … mesne profits as including interest. This contention is based upon what may be termed the explanation Clause to Section 211 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is therein stated that mesne profits of property mean certain profits

Ganga Prasad Vs. Gajadhar Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All651

profits - Procedure on the hearing of appeal--Objection--Act X of 1877 (Civil Procedure Code), Sections 211, 56l. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Chhakauri Khan Vs. Pir Bakhsh Khan and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All279

II of 1901 (Agra Tenancy Act), Section 159--Code of Civil Procedure (Act XIV of 1882). Section 310A--Appeal--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … orders passed in execution would lie to the Collector, Commissioner and the Board of Revenue (vide Sections 210, 211 of Act No. III of 1901), and the orders parsed by the Collector and the Board of Revenue

Municipal Board Vs. Habib Ullah

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1939All383

of State for India in Council. For the reasons given above, we dismiss this appeal with costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under Section 186. It has further held that the board had no power to issue any notice under Section 211 because here there was no 'street' involved.2. The argument of the learned Counsel for the appellant before us

Chhote Lal Vs. Chandra Bhan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1923)ILR45All59

costs throughout. Hindu Law - Adoption--Evidence--Proof of adoption after the death of the three persons immediately concerned. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … right to which he is entitled on that basis. In Skinner v. Naunihal Singh (1913) I.L.R. 35 All. 211 their Lordships of the Privy Council permitted an alternative case set up by the appellant on appeal to

M/S. Shyam Gas Company Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226 and 229; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Uttar Pradesh Essential Commodities (Display of Prices and Stocks and Control of Supply and Distribution) Order, 1977; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Uttar Pradesh Accommodation Requisition Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1) and (2); Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : AIR1991All129; (1991)1UPLBEC355

unconscionable - such a contract would be void as what is unconscionable is opposed to public policy. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … argument reliance was placed in v. U. S. Samiti Ltd. v. Divisional Manager, I.O.C. Ltd. (AIR 1986 All 211). It was held in this case that the grant of licence was a discretionary matter and at best

Mini Taxi Owners and Drivers Association and ors. Vs. the State of A.P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Hyderabad City Police Act, 1348 - Sections 21, 21(1), 21(2), 82 and 85; Hyderabad City Police Rules; Hyderabad City Police Orders; Hyderabad City Police Regulations; Motor Vehicles Taxation Act; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(7), 2(40), 66, 67, 67(3), 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 84, 85 and 86; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 33(1); Bombay Police Rules - Rule 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21 and 226; Central Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 2

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2421

as expeditiously as possible.45. With the above directions, the writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Lukose. K.C., vs the Deputy Commissioner,

Court : Kerala

the case of those situated within the area of a municipal corporation or a municipal council or a cantonment, and at one hundred and thirty five per cent of the purchase value of such liquor, in the … P9 issued by the 1st respondent under the provisions of Section 7 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (“Act”, for short) for the financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24, whereby the petitioner's applications for compounding of