Advanced Search Results

Binda Prasad Vs. Madho Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All129

Procedure Code), S. 194. - Decree payable by instalments--Act X Of 1877 (Civil Procedure Code), Section 210. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

C.N. Shetty Vs. Hillock Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 48, 210, 283(1), 397, 398, 400 and 402

Reported in : [1996]87CompCas1(AP)

oppressed's share by oppressor - Court directed respondents to purchase petitioner's share at rate fixed by Court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of allotting entire rights shares to Indian shareholders was passed) was held in accordance with law. 39. Interpreting section 210 of the English Companies Act, which is analogous to sections 397 and 402 of the Act, Lord Denning

Emperor Vs. Muhammad Yusuf

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1917All408; (1917)ILR39All386; 40Ind.Cas.317

and 210 - 'Erect a structure'--Movables planks placed across a public drain in front of a shop. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Bachchu Vs. Madad Ali

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All649

is to be satisfied. Act X of 1877 (Civil Procedure Code), Section 210 - Decree for money. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Smt. Naseem Sultana Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board Rep by Its

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

pleaded by the petitioners, the powers and duties of respondent No.2 are enumerated under Section 25 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act'). The learned Standing Counsel for the Secunderabad Cantonment Board has not disputed that the

Punnam Aruna Vs. Election Commission and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 210, 225, 225C, 225D, 225(1), 225(2), 232 and 233; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1994 - Rule 69; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Members and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayats, Members of Mandal Parishads and Members of Zilla Parishads) Rules, 2006 - Rules 55, 56, 59 and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 243E and 324

Reported in : 2007(1)ALD284; 2007(1)ALT138

a period of four months from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 23.8.2006 is the date fixed for the first meeting of the elected body of the 3rd Ordinary Elections.19. Section 210 of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act 1994 (hereinafter, for short, referred to as 'the Act' for the purpose

Namathoti Sankaramma Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 173, 202, 210, 210(1), 210(2) and 210(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 120B, 209, 302, 306, 406, 448, 489 and 506

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)588; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)17; 2000CriLJ4831

giving opportunity of being heard to all concerned.The Criminal Petition is disposed of with the above directions. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … This is obvious from the concluding part of his order, which is extracted below Further by virtue of Section 210(2) of Cr.P.C. both the matters can be clubbed together and tried together treating as if both the cases

Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karedla Suryanarayana and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 10F, 43A(1A), 163, 209, 219, 284, 397, 398 and 402; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 19; Company Law Board Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 44; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 59, 102 and 114; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2002]110CompCas193(AP)

Committee of Chartered Accountants appointed by High Court to determine valuation of shares held by minority shareholders. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of physical or mental discomfort or weariness.266. As Section 397 of the Act being a corresponding Section to Section 210 of the old English Act, counsel for the petitioner placed reliance both on English decisions as well as

G. Sri Hari Vs. Nandkishore Lahoti and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 191 and 210

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)646; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)556; 2003CriLJ643

both cases to be clubbed and not to be quashed as it would cause prejudice to respondent. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in W.P. No. 15427 of 1996, this petition is not maintainable and in any event in view of Section 210 Cr.P.C. both cases can be tried together as held in TELLA ZEDSON vs. CHAGANTI KISTA RAO AND OTHERS,

Brooke Bond India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunals Act, 1987 - Sections 17, 17(1), 17(2) and 18(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 210 and 228; Limitation Act - Sections 18 and 29(2)

Reported in : 2003ACJ647; AIR2001AP526; 2001(5)ALT448

- delay may be condoned under Railway Act on sufficient cause - held, petition beyond limitation period. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that the proceedings before the Tribunal shall be deemed to be 'judicial proceedings' as contemplated under Sections 193, 210 and 228, IPC, they do not make the Railway Claims Tribunal a 'Civil Court'. Analogous provision to Section