Advanced Search Results

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … of 2013 was closed on 17.02.2014. A notification dated 05.03.2015 was issued by the Government of India under Section 15 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) directing elections to be conducted to … conducted on 17.05.2016 and the results were declared.5. By a judgment dated 21.07.2015, a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed Writ

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

2(20) of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined … by respondent No. 3 by filing Appeal No. 20 of 2005 before the School Tribunal at Solapur, under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 (for short, ''MEPS Act').

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … Cantonment Board by virtue of the order, dated 18.12.2006, as arbitrary and illegal being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 243P of the Constitution of India, apart from being contrary to the various provisions of the present

T.P.Cherian Philip Vs. The National Highways Authority of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

also claims W.A. No. 1665 of 2015 -:2. :- registration certificate under the Food Safety and Standards Authority Act, 2006. Petitioner claims that he is carrying on business in a place where there is no traffic and in … is entrusted with the various functions regarding street vendors/stationary vendors including the relocation is constituted under Section 22. Section 21, 22(1) and 22 (2) which are relevant are quoted below:"1. (1) Every local authority shall, in consultation with … Municipal Council or a Nagar Panchayat, by whatever name called, or the Cantonment Board, or as the case may be, a civil area committee appointed

Koppu Satyanarayana Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 122, 250 and 340; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 179 and 181; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD443

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Koppu Satyanamyana, filed the present writ petition for a writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No. EB/P No. 21/Akula Narayana Cly/Pkt/55/580, dated 20.2.2007 as illegal, untenable, illogical, irrational and consequently to set aside the same by directing

Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Section 57; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

order dated 20th February 2009 whereby in exercise of its power to review under Section 57 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 („CA 2006) the Government of India („GOI) in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) (Respondent No.1) set aside a … of the old sanction.10. A show cause notice was issued by the MoD to the CB Meerut on 21st November 2008 as to why the sanction should not be revoked or modified. A detailed reply was furnished

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … Clause (i) from among persons who are registered voters in the Mandal and who are not less than 21 years of age.151. Election of members from territorial constituencies :-(1) One member shall be elected to the Mandal

ilam Singh Vs. Vith Addl. District Judge, Muzaffarnagar and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47, 73 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 72, 84, 84(1) and (2), 85, 86, 90 and 94

Reported in : AIR1991All34

the deposit - non compliance - sale a nullity - Court has discretion to forfeit the deposit. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … holder.4. The petitioner alleged that there has been a violation of Rules 84, 85 and 86 of Order 21, C.P.C., therefore, the auction sale in favour of the decree holder is void and a nullity in the

K. Srinivas Rao and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secreta ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 21; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 16, 17, 18 and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 162

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD510

Force is contrary to law but not precluded from taking any decision on subject accordance with law. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 1957 (for short 'the Act'). The Act stipulated the broad structure of the Force and matters connected therewith. Section 21 thereof empowered the Central Government to frame Rules. Initially Railway Protection Force Rules were framed in the year

Mittakola Venkata Rama Rao Vs. Sarpanch, Grampanchayath, Mahaboobabad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 48A, 51-A and 226; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD343; 1998(6)ALT440

- held, construction would lead to environmental pollution which was against fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.