Advanced Search Results
Nutech Agros Ltd. and ors. Vs. Ch. Mohan Rao and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-07-1999
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 205 and 207
2000(1)ALD(Cri)255; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)305
obligation to establish negative facts - held, summoning of documents from bank would be irrelevant and futile. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … from Sub-section (5)(b) which says that any dividend payable in cash may be paid by cheque or warrant.11. Section 207 stipulates that where a dividend is declared by a company but the same has not been paid, or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMazhar Ali Khan Vs. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur and Others
Allahabad
Mar-08-1995
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 207 (1) and (2)
AIR1996All16
- held, Regional Transport Authority cannot refuse such application just because vehicle is seized by Police Officer. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … as the vehicle has been seized by the police Official, he has no power under sub-section (2) of Section 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to release the vehiclepetitioner also moved
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. A.V. Reddy, Trust Shri B.V. Harish Redd ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-06-1998
Direct Taxation
[1999]106TAXMAN631(AP)
the trust but only the interest of the beneficiary in the trust property was to be included. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … appellate authority. On reference: HELD The Supreme Court in the case of 13harat Hari Singhania v. CWT [19941 207ITR 1173 Taxman 3 has held that the advance tax paid is not really an asset but the proforma
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Emperor Vs. Satish Chandra Ghosh
Allahabad
Mar-03-1917
Company
(1917)ILR39All412
Act), Sections 207(ii) and 208 - Voluntary winding up--Appointment of liquidator--Liability of liquidator acting under irregular appointment. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Navabharat Enterprises
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-24-2001
Direct Taxation
[2001]253ITR316(AP)
Tax Act 1961 s.80HHC In the Andhra Pradesh High Court S.R. Nayak & S. Ananda Reddy, JJ. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to get deduction on' incremental turnover under section 80HHC(1)(b). Case Law Analysis: CIT v. Indian Products Ltd. (1994) 207 ITR 647 (Cal) followed. Application: Also to current assessment year. Decision: In favour of assessee. Income Tax Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Abdul Subhan Vs. State of A.P. and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-01-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1978 - Sections 207, 208 and 209
2001(2)ALD(Cri)507; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)297
209 (1) (b) - bail cannot be cancelled as respondents have been appearing before Court for trial. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a new clause which clarifies that the commitment is to be made after complying with the provisions of section 207 or 208 and that the committing Court will also have the power to make an order for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMan Kunwar Vs. Dilip Singh,
Allahabad
Jan-05-1921
Arbitration
(1921)ILR43All389
as to title of One of the parties--Award no bar to suit possession in a Civil Court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … estopped the plaintiff from litigating the question of her title in the Civil Court Reliance is placed on Section 207, Clause (2), of the Land Revenue Act, which provides that no person shall institute any suit in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra Pal Singh Vs. General Officer, Commanding-in-chief, Headquarte ...
Allahabad
Aug-01-1997
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 133 and 164(2); Army Rules, 59 and 60; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 161(3), 164 and 207; Constitution of India - Article 226
1998(1)AWC53
question - no requirement of recording reason for the findings and sentence imposed in Court martial proceedings. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … statement was not supplied to the petitioner and thereby there has been a breach of the principle underlying Section 207, Cr. P.C. He has further submitted that by virtue of Section 133 of the Army Act, the Indian
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBansilal Yadav Vs. Suraj Chand Bhagat and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-15-2006
Tenancy
Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2) and 22; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Transfer Property Act - Sections 5 and 105; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Rules, 1961 - Rules 3, 7(4), 7(5), 8, 8(3), 22(4), 22(5) and 22(6); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 10 and 151 - Order 5, Rule 20 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 5, Rule 20 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
2007(2)ALD302; 2007(2)ALT491
thousand only) to be paid by the landlord/revision petitioner to the tenants/respondents in each Civil Revision Petition. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChanga and ors. Vs. ChaudhraIn Bhagwan Dei
Allahabad
Mar-31-1949
Property
AIR1949All493
Court and dismiss the suit with costs throughout.24. Leave to appeal under the Letters Patent is refused. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 18) for the correction of entries and demarcation of their graveyard, claiming that plots 203, 204,205, 206 and 207 constituted their burial ground. This-application was obviously necessitated by the fact that the khasras had not recorded any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »