Advanced Search Results

Daya Kishan Vs. Nanhi Begam and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1898)ILR20All304

of 1877 (Indian Limitation Act), Schedule ii, Article 179--Application to the proper Court--Civil Procedure Code, Section 206. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Lakho Bibi Vs. Salamat Ali

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1898)ILR20All337

bring decree into accordance with the judgment--Decree erroneous but in accordance with judgment--Decree not susceptible of alteration. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … It arises out of an order made by the Subordinate Judge of Allahabad on an application presented under Section 206 of the Code. The facts are these. The respondent here, Syed Salamat Ali, was the holder of a

Darbo Vs. Kesho Rai

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All364

of decree - Limitation--Civil Procedure Code, Section 206--Act XV of 1877 (Limitation Act), Schedule ii, No. 178. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate 1. These thirteen petitions presented under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority … ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate + + + + CRL.L.P. 206/2015 DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD Through: Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate ........ Petitioner Crl. L.P.

Ratna Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Large Land Holdings Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(15) and 7(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 3(14), 134, 143, 144 and 146

Reported in : AIR1966All34

right to use it for agricultural purpose - acquisition of right - held, petitioner liable to assessment. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … residential or industrial purposes, the worst that can befall the petitioner is a suit for his ejectment under Section 206 of U. P. Act No. 1 of 1951 at the hands of the Gaon Samaj, but the sirdar

Bholai Khan Vs. Abu Jafar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1899)ILR21All267

the merits in the Court of First Instance--Act No. XII of 1881 (N.W.P. Rent Act), Section 208. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … clearly of opinion that the learned Judge of the Lower Appellate Court is wrong in thinking that Sections 206, 207 and 208 would not apply to a case which has not been tried on the merits. The

Adhunik Alloys and Power Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5(1), 10, 11, 11(5), 13, 17(2), 17(4) and 17A; Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3A, 3A(1), 3B and 4; Cantonment Act, 1910; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Cantonments Act 1924 - Sections 60; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1917 - Sections 6(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 - Sections 3(2), 6 and 7; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 15(1), 21(2), 26(1), 31, 39(1), 40, 58, 58

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1185; [2007(2)JCR357(Jhr)]

Cantonment Boards in M.P. issued notifications during the period from 1973 to 1979 under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act 1924 imposing tax on the entry of motor vehicles at specified rates. The High Court quashed the said … v. Ganesh Wood Products : AIR1996SC149 . On the question of validity of notification of 1962, 1969 and 2006, learned Counsel submitted that since the constitutional and statutory resource of power exists, omission to mention the provisions … to quote the relevant portions of the notification which reads as under: 206 .It is lastly submitted that the State Government cannot be allowed to

NaraIn Sahai and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All333

Counsel who supports the reference has contended. I would, therefore, reject the reference.42. The reference is rejected. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … view is in consonance with the decision of this Court in Queen-Empress v. Rahim Bakhsh ('98) 20 All. 206 in which it was held thatthe object of requiring security to be of good behaviour is, not to

Changa and ors. Vs. ChaudhraIn Bhagwan Dei

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1949All493

Court and dismiss the suit with costs throughout.24. Leave to appeal under the Letters Patent is refused. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … applied (Ex. 18) for the correction of entries and demarcation of their graveyard, claiming that plots 203, 204,205, 206 and 207 constituted their burial ground. This-application was obviously necessitated by the fact that the khasras had not

Executive Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board Vs. Auro Swamy and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 179 and 181; Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976; Public Premises (Eviction or Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 151 - Order 41

Reported in : 2007(4)ALD796; 2007(5)ALT786

action according to the plaintiffs is contrary to the provisions of the law and especially that of the Cantonments Act, as no notice of show-cause has been issued, therefore, entire such action on their part is totally illegal. … been granted after expiry of the statutory period, therefore, they had commenced erection of the sheds in September, 2006. While the work was in progress the officials of defendants 1 and 2 without any prior notice or … without making a formal application and obtaining a permission as required under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act no person can raise any structure. Further, … date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.CMP No. 206 of 2007 in CMA No. 41 of 20071. On behalf of the