Advanced Search Results

Y. Venkata Reddy Vs. Jagadamba Enterprises Rep. by Its Manager Vilas M ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 204, 313 and 482; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 30, Rule 10

Reported in : 2002(1)ALT(Cri)329; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)212; [2003]44SCL35(AP)

as principle of res judicata apply to criminal case - held, petition dismissed as review not permissible. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … took cognizance of the cases and issued summons to the petitioner. Petitioner filed petitions in each case under Section 204 Cr.P.C. seeking to discharge him from the cases, inter alia, contending that the complaints filed by the complainant

K. Thyagaraj Vs. Reserve Bank of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 58B and 58C

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD(Cri)759; [2001]107CompCas479(AP)

produced during trial - held, as per specific assertion petitioner was incharge of company so proceedings valid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of H.P. [1980] Crl. LJ NOC 163 (HP) in which it has been held that the magistrate under Section 204 of the CPC Act does not enjoy unrestricted power to summon a person at his whim, fancy or

Sri Ram and anr. Vs. Makka

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All108

money yircn by one decree-holder on behalf of both--Sale set aside--Ayyeal--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 244, 204, 311. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … of 2013 was closed on 17.02.2014. A notification dated 05.03.2015 was issued by the Government of India under Section 15 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) directing elections to be conducted to … Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed Writ Appeal Nos. 204 of 2015 filed by the Union of India and others and Writ

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate 1. These thirteen petitions presented under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority … versus SMT SHAMIM BANO ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate CRL.L.P. 204/2015 DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD Through: Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus MAHESH

Prem Singh and ors. Vs. Hukam Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1947 - Sections 27(3); Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 165, 171, 180, 202 and 204; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Rules, 1951; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 129 to 230 and 344; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Act, 1950 - Sections 184 and 230

Reported in : AIR1974All50

cannot be recognized to have a retrospective effect which would divest persons of rights vested in them. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of limitation was one year. On the expiry of that prescribed period of limitation, they became sirdars under Section 204 of the Act5. The consolidation authorities concurrently found that the erstwhile sub-tenants hud continued to remain in possession

Parmeshar Rai and ors. Vs. Sheo NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All270

title decided by a Court of Revenue under Section 39 of Act No. XII of 1881--Res judicata. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … No. XII of 1881 had been determined between the parties by a reference to a Civil Court under Section 204 of that Act or in a suit instituted in accordance with an order of a Court of Revenue

Mughla Begam and ors. Vs. Bans Bahadur Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All604

costs of the respondent--Execution of decree against surety--Act X of 1877 (Civil Procedure Code), Sections 253, 610. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Mr. Justice Straight, who dissent from the majority of the Court, after noticing the course of decision under Section 204, Act VIII of 1859 (which undoubtedly supports the opinions I am now expressing), wind up their views on

K. Laxma Reddy and ors. Vs. the State of A.P. Through Sho, Keesara P.S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 323, 324, 354 and 447; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 147, 156(3), 190, 190(1), 200, 202, 203, 204, 342, 448 and 482; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 142

Reported in : 2003(1)ALT(Cri)309

express provisions of Section 200 - held, cognizance taken by Magistrate bad in law so proceedings quashed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 156(3) only at the pre-cognizance stage, that is to say, before taking cognizance under S. 190, 200 and 204 and where a Magistrate decides to take cognizance under the provisions of Ch. 14 he is not entitled

Punnam Aruna Vs. Election Commission and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 210, 225, 225C, 225D, 225(1), 225(2), 232 and 233; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1994 - Rule 69; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Members and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayats, Members of Mandal Parishads and Members of Zilla Parishads) Rules, 2006 - Rules 55, 56, 59 and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 243E and 324

Reported in : 2007(1)ALD284; 2007(1)ALT138

a period of four months from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … candidate Symbol No. of votes gained_______________________________________________________________________1. Thoutam Sarojana Door 4872. Nallabheem Vijayalaxmi Gas Stove 3463. Punnam Aruna Harmonium 204. Merugu Rajeshwari Hat 035. Vadija Hamsa Bai Iron Box 08Invalid votes 15_______________________________________________________________________Total votes polled 879_______________________________________________________________________17. As per the