Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 2 · Page 1 of about 7,321 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 11 2008

Shri Vinod Kumar Bakshi and ors. Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2008

Subject : Election

Acts : Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 17, 28, 28(2), 29, 30 and 31; Cantonment Act, 1924; Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rules 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(3), 13(7), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1) and 19; Cantonment Board Rules - Rule 13(3)

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi131; 149(2008)DLT643

50,000 persons and consequently it is a category 1 cantonment.10. Prior to coming into force of the Cantonment Act, 2006, the Delhi Cantonment Board was governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924 which provided for seven members on the … as member of the Board are concerned, the same are contained in Sections 28 & 29 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 which deserves to be … ward No. 3 of Delhi Cantt. on 2nd January, 2008 by the Chief Executive Officer of the Delhi Cantonment Board, and have assailed the action of the respondent No. 1 in causing to be published an electoral … publication of Electoral Rolls for ward No. 3 of Delhi Cantt. on 2nd January, 2008 by the Chief Executive Officer of the Delhi Cantonment Board,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2007

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2007

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

2(20) of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined … placed before the Full Bench, it was of the view that a recent amendment to Sub-section (21) of Section 2 of MEPS Act has changed the scenario. The term 'recognised' in the context of a recognised school is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K. Babu Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181A, 181(3), 194 and 194(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD330

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter-affidavit are not … serious controversy that the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924 alone would be applicable to the present case. Section 2 of the Act deals with definitions and Section 2(4) of the Act defines building as under:'building' means a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 13 2007

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-13-2007

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … have been at the time of his election or nomination subject to any of the disqualifications specified in Sub-section (2) of Section 28 or in Section 29; or(b) has absented himself for more than three consecutive meetings or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2012

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and ors Vs. Ms.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-02-2012

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (AP) Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)(i), 10(3)(iii)(a), 32(c); Cantonment Act, 2006 - Section 60, Chapter-III; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIV Rule 12

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. 3. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation … ORDER: 1. This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 22.12.2011, in R.A.No.116 of 2011, on the file of the learned Chief Judge,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K.S. Ashok Kumar S/O. Late Sri K. Sailoo Vs. the Cantonment Execut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181(3), 181A, 194 and 194(2); Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD580

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter affidavit are … serious controversy that the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924 alone would be applicable to the present case. Section 2 of the Act deals with definitions and Section 2(4) of the Act defines building as under:'building' means a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2007

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … for determination in this petition filed for striking down Section 4(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 (for short, 'the 2005 Act') and for issue of a mandamus to the respondents to include the Sarpanchas

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2017

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … specify the purpose for which he intends to put to use the building to which the notice relates. Sub-Section (2) of Section 236 further makes it clear that no such notice would be valid until Crl. L.P. 70/2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2008

Ramesh Chouksey Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-09-2008

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT48

of 1951 is not applicable to elections to the Cantonment Board and that only the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act of 2006') and the Rules of 2007 are applicable.11. Sub-section (1) of Section 29 … ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is an appeal tiled under Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 against the order dated 7-4-2008 passed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial