Advanced Search Results

Banwari Lal and ors. Vs. Musammat Gopi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1908)ILR30All44

- Limitation--Defendant referred to Civil Court--Act No. XV of 1877 (Indian Limitation Act), Schedule II, Article 120. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the grove in question. Thereupon the Revenue Court passed an order on the 13th of November 1903, under Section 199, Clause (a) of Act No. II of 1901', requiring them to institute a suit within three months in

Laxmi Lodge and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilMunicipal Tax

Acts : Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 199 and 489

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD605; 2003(1)ALT30

respondent to levy such charges - held, Municipality not empowered to levy and collect such charges again. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … levy and collect taxes on lands and buildings, which is called 'the property tax' and in terms of Section 199 the said 'property tax' includes 'conservancy tax' and when once the Corporation has collected conservancy tax as one

Khaliq Singh and ors. Vs. Lal Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : TenancyProperty

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All323

199 - Suit for arrears of rent--Tenant not pleading proprietary title--Subsequent suit for declaration of title--Res judicata. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Genda and Rai Singh Vs. Sukh Nath Rai

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1908)ILR30All25

of 1901 (Agra Tenancy Act), Sections 177, 199, 200 - Question of proprietary title--Appeal--Civil and Revenue Courts--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Lachman Das Vs. Nabi Bakhsh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All109

Act), Sections 31, 57, 179 and 199 - Suit by zamindar for ejectment of tenant and sub-lessee--Appeal--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Suraj Mal Vs. Hira Kunwar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1915All55; (1915)ILR37All94

Section 199 - Suit for ejectment--Plea that defendant was holding under an unexpired lease--Question of proprietary title. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Smt. K. Durga Rani and Another Vs. Appropriate Authority and Another.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1998]231ITR472(AP); [1998]100TAXMAN492(AP)

: Also to current assessment years. Income Tax Act 1961 s.269UD Income Tax Act 1961 Chapter XX-C - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the order No. AA/Hyd/6 (08) 9/96-97 dated December 31, 1996, under section 269UD(1), Income-tax Act, 1961, passed by the appropriate authority (Income-tax Department, Bangalore) and to quash the

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and Others Vs. M/S.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation area. … Sri R.Chandrashekar Reddy !Counsel for the respondent: Sri K.Mohan Cases referred:1. AIR 199.SC 121.2. 1969 APLJ 1 (SN) ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out

Shyam Lal Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4 and 199; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498

Reported in : AIR1958All76; 1958CriLJ11

- facts mentioned must disclose the offence under Section 498 - otherwise no cognizance to be made. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … convicted under Section 498, I. P. C., in absence of any complaint under that section by Babu Lal. Section 199, Cr. P. C. provides -'No Court shall take cognisance of an offence under Section 497 or Section 498

Pritama Reddy Vs. Charminar Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 141; Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 26 - Order 4, Rule 1 - Order 6, Rule 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 199 and 482

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)452; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)244

Section 141 is a valid ground to quash proceedings - held, petition to quash proceedings not sustainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that specific complaint. Since it was a case of defamation, a complaint can be filed in view of Section 199 of the Code by the person aggrieved, namely, the person defamed. A Power of Attorney given in general